Norconsult Valuation
Is JL80 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?
Valuation Score
2/6Valuation Score 2/6
Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast
Share Price vs Fair Value
What is the Fair Price of JL80 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.
Below Fair Value: JL80 (€3.56) is trading below our estimate of fair value (€5.63)
Significantly Below Fair Value: JL80 is trading below fair value by more than 20%.
Key Valuation Metric
Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for JL80?
Key metric: As JL80 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.
| What is JL80's PE Ratio? | |
|---|---|
| PE Ratio | 33.7x |
| Earnings | NOK 367.00m |
| Market Cap | NOK 12.37b |
| Key Statistics | |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Value/Revenue | 1.3x |
| Enterprise Value/EBITDA | 23x |
| PEG Ratio | 1.1x |
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers
How does JL80's PE Ratio compare to its peers?
| Company | Forward PE | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Average | 16.3x | ||
B5A0 BAUER | 32.3x | 38.2% | €174.7m |
HOT HOCHTIEF | 13.2x | 1.9% | €9.5b |
WAC Wacker Neuson | 12x | 29.0% | €968.5m |
KSB KSB SE KGaA | 7.6x | 7.7% | €1.1b |
JL80 Norconsult | 33.7x | 30.1% | €12.4b |
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: JL80 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (33.7x) compared to the peer average (16.2x).
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry
How does JL80's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the European Construction Industry?
| 2 Companies | Price / Earnings | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Companies | Estimated Growth | Market Cap | |
|---|---|---|---|
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: JL80 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (33.7x) compared to the European Construction industry average (13.4x).
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio
What is JL80's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.
| Fair Ratio | |
|---|---|
| Current PE Ratio | 33.7x |
| Fair PE Ratio | 20.1x |
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: JL80 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (33.7x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (20.1x).
Analyst Price Targets
What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?
| Date | Share Price | Average 1Y Price Target | Dispersion | High | Low | 1Y Actual price | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | €3.56 | €3.75 +5.4% | 1.9% | €3.85 | €3.68 | n/a | 3 |
| Dec ’25 | €3.46 | €3.75 +8.6% | 1.9% | €3.85 | €3.68 | n/a | 3 |
| Nov ’25 | €2.99 | €3.49 +16.9% | 4.1% | €3.63 | €3.29 | n/a | 3 |
| Sep ’25 | €3.03 | €3.30 +9.1% | 0.6% | €3.31 | €3.27 | n/a | 3 |
| Aug ’25 | €2.66 | €3.10 +16.5% | 3.9% | €3.24 | €2.95 | n/a | 3 |
| Jul ’25 | €2.98 | €2.97 -0.3% | 2.4% | €3.05 | €2.88 | n/a | 3 |
| Jun ’25 | €2.79 | €2.95 +6.1% | 3.7% | €3.07 | €2.81 | n/a | 3 |
| May ’25 | €2.33 | €2.79 +19.9% | 4.7% | €2.97 | €2.67 | n/a | 3 |
| Apr ’25 | €2.27 | €2.87 +26.5% | 4.7% | €3.06 | €2.76 | n/a | 3 |
| Mar ’25 | €2.39 | €2.83 +18.5% | 6.5% | €3.08 | €2.64 | n/a | 3 |
| Feb ’25 | €2.22 | €2.56 +15.6% | 3.2% | €2.62 | €2.45 | n/a | 3 |
| Jan ’25 | €2.12 | €2.56 +20.9% | 3.4% | €2.65 | €2.47 | n/a | 2 |
Analyst Forecast: Target price is less than 20% higher than the current share price.
Discover undervalued companies
Company Analysis and Financial Data Status
| Data | Last Updated (UTC time) |
|---|---|
| Company Analysis | 2024/12/17 19:41 |
| End of Day Share Price | 2024/12/17 00:00 |
| Earnings | 2024/09/30 |
| Annual Earnings | 2023/12/31 |
Data Sources
The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.
| Package | Data | Timeframe | Example US Source * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Financials | 10 years |
| |
| Analyst Consensus Estimates | +3 years |
|
|
| Market Prices | 30 years |
| |
| Ownership | 10 years |
| |
| Management | 10 years |
| |
| Key Developments | 10 years |
|
* example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.
Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more here.
Analysis Model and Snowflake
Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.
Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.
Industry and Sector Metrics
Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on .
Analyst Sources
Norconsult ASA is covered by 3 analysts. 3 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.
| Analyst | Institution |
|---|---|
| Johan Ström | Carnegie Investment Bank AB |
| Simen Mortensen | DNB Markets |
| Martine Emelie Kverne | Nordea Markets |