Beijing Easpring Material TechnologyLTD Valuation
Is 300073 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?
Valuation Score
3/6Valuation Score 3/6
Below Future Cash Flow Value
Significantly Below Future Cash Flow Value
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast
Share Price vs Fair Value
What is the Fair Price of 300073 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.
Ultimate guide to DCF valuation for stock investing
Learn how to determine fair value like the best investors in the world.
Below Future Cash Flow Value: 300073 (CN¥40.85) is trading above our estimate of future cash flow value (CN¥9.39)
Significantly Below Future Cash Flow Value: 300073 is trading above our estimate of future cash flow value.
Key Valuation Metric
Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 300073?
Key metric: As 300073 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.
| What is 300073's PE Ratio? | |
|---|---|
| PE Ratio | 27.8x |
| Earnings | CN¥798.54m |
| Market Cap | CN¥22.23b |
| Key Statistics | |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Value/Revenue | 1.3x |
| Enterprise Value/EBITDA | 13.4x |
| PEG Ratio | 1x |
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Peers
How does 300073's PE Ratio compare to its peers?
| Company | Forward PE | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Average | 96.3x | ||
600516 FangDa Carbon New MaterialLtd | 208.6x | n/a | CN¥19.8b |
688779 Minmetals New Energy Materials(Hunan)Co.Ltd | 38.1x | n/a | CN¥14.2b |
002518 Shenzhen KSTAR Science and Technology | 30.8x | 31.17% | CN¥19.7b |
688813 Xi'an Taijin New Energy & Materials Sci-Tech | 107.5x | n/a | CN¥18.9b |
300073 Beijing Easpring Material TechnologyLTD | 27.8x | 27.81% | CN¥22.2b |
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers: 300073 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (27.8x) compared to the peer average (96.3x).
Historical Price to Earnings Ratio
Historical Price to Earnings Ratio compares a stock's price to its earnings over time. Higher ratios indicate that investors are willing to pay more for the stock.
Fetching historical data
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry
How does 300073's PE Ratio compare vs other companies in the CN Electrical Industry?
| 1 Company | Price / Earnings | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
300023 Bode Energy Equipment | 3.6x | n/a | US$51.42m |
| 1 Company | Estimated Growth | Market Cap |
|---|
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: 300073 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (27.8x) compared to the CN Electrical industry average (44.8x).
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio
What is 300073's PE Ratio compared to its Fair PE Ratio? This is the expected PE Ratio taking into account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors.
| Fair Ratio | |
|---|---|
| Current PE Ratio | 27.8x |
| Fair PE Ratio | 32x |
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: 300073 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (27.8x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (32x).
Analyst Price Targets
What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?
| Date | Share Price | Average 1Y Price Target | Dispersion | High | Low | 1Y Actual price | Analysts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | CN¥40.85 | CN¥64.69 +58.35% | 18.58% | CN¥78.75 | CN¥47.00 | n/a | 4 |
| Jul ’27 | CN¥48.76 | CN¥70.69 +44.97% | 8.97% | CN¥78.75 | CN¥61.00 | n/a | 4 |
| Jun ’27 | CN¥55.48 | CN¥72.55 +30.77% | 9.35% | CN¥80.00 | CN¥61.00 | n/a | 5 |
| May ’27 | CN¥63.44 | CN¥72.55 +14.36% | 9.35% | CN¥80.00 | CN¥61.00 | n/a | 5 |
| Apr ’27 | CN¥53.04 | CN¥68.27 +28.71% | 14.96% | CN¥82.00 | CN¥54.60 | n/a | 6 |
| Mar ’27 | CN¥57.02 | CN¥69.93 +22.64% | 16.06% | CN¥82.00 | CN¥50.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Feb ’27 | CN¥57.20 | CN¥69.93 +22.25% | 16.06% | CN¥82.00 | CN¥50.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Jan ’27 | CN¥57.80 | CN¥69.93 +20.98% | 16.06% | CN¥82.00 | CN¥50.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Dec ’26 | CN¥59.16 | CN¥69.93 +18.20% | 16.06% | CN¥82.00 | CN¥50.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Nov ’26 | CN¥69.18 | CN¥62.60 -9.52% | 25.12% | CN¥82.00 | CN¥36.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Oct ’26 | CN¥66.39 | CN¥55.63 -16.21% | 19.43% | CN¥71.00 | CN¥36.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Sep ’26 | CN¥49.01 | CN¥48.55 -0.93% | 14.84% | CN¥55.76 | CN¥36.00 | n/a | 5 |
| Aug ’26 | CN¥41.38 | CN¥42.51 +2.73% | 15.25% | CN¥50.00 | CN¥32.00 | n/a | 6 |
| Jul ’26 | CN¥43.30 | CN¥42.51 -1.83% | 15.25% | CN¥50.00 | CN¥32.00 | CN¥48.76 | 6 |
| Jun ’26 | CN¥37.94 | CN¥43.81 +15.47% | 14.48% | CN¥50.00 | CN¥32.00 | CN¥55.48 | 5 |
| May ’26 | CN¥37.87 | CN¥43.81 +15.69% | 14.48% | CN¥50.00 | CN¥32.00 | CN¥63.44 | 5 |
| Apr ’26 | CN¥40.85 | CN¥43.32 +6.05% | 13.93% | CN¥49.60 | CN¥32.00 | CN¥53.04 | 5 |
| Mar ’26 | CN¥44.99 | CN¥40.43 -10.14% | 17.73% | CN¥46.58 | CN¥29.00 | CN¥57.02 | 6 |
| Feb ’26 | CN¥36.90 | CN¥41.37 +12.11% | 13.95% | CN¥46.58 | CN¥29.00 | CN¥57.20 | 7 |
| Jan ’26 | CN¥40.28 | CN¥41.37 +2.70% | 13.95% | CN¥46.58 | CN¥29.00 | CN¥57.80 | 7 |
| Dec ’25 | CN¥45.87 | CN¥41.37 -9.81% | 13.95% | CN¥46.58 | CN¥29.00 | CN¥59.16 | 7 |
| Nov ’25 | CN¥42.59 | CN¥41.37 -2.87% | 13.95% | CN¥46.58 | CN¥29.00 | CN¥69.18 | 7 |
| Oct ’25 | CN¥43.32 | CN¥36.05 -16.79% | 17.04% | CN¥43.00 | CN¥28.00 | CN¥66.39 | 7 |
| Sep ’25 | CN¥30.46 | CN¥36.48 +19.75% | 15.70% | CN¥43.00 | CN¥28.00 | CN¥49.01 | 7 |
| Aug ’25 | CN¥30.37 | CN¥40.99 +34.98% | 18.69% | CN¥51.96 | CN¥28.00 | CN¥41.38 | 7 |
| Jul ’25 | CN¥34.33 | CN¥43.42 +26.49% | 17.86% | CN¥51.96 | CN¥28.00 | CN¥43.30 | 7 |
Analyst Forecast: Target price is more than 20% higher than the current share price, but analysts are not within a statistically confident range of agreement.
Discover undervalued companies
Company Analysis and Financial Data Status
| Data | Last Updated (UTC time) |
|---|---|
| Company Analysis | 2026/07/23 21:46 |
| End of Day Share Price | 2026/07/23 00:00 |
| Earnings | 2026/03/31 |
| Annual Earnings | 2025/12/31 |
Data Sources
The data used in our company analysis is from S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. The following data is used in our analysis model to generate this report. Data is normalised which can introduce a delay from the source being available.
| Package | Data | Timeframe | Example US Source * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Company Financials | 10 years |
| |
| Analyst Consensus Estimates | +3 years |
|
|
| Market Prices | 30 years |
| |
| Ownership | 10 years |
| |
| Management | 10 years |
| |
| Key Developments | 10 years |
|
* Example for US securities, for non-US equivalent regulatory forms and sources are used.
Unless specified all financial data is based on a yearly period but updated quarterly. This is known as Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) or Last Twelve Month (LTM) Data. Learn more.
Analysis Model and Snowflake
Details of the analysis model used to generate this report is available on our Github page, we also have guides on how to use our reports and tutorials on Youtube.
Learn about the world class team who designed and built the Simply Wall St analysis model.
Industry and Sector Metrics
Our industry and section metrics are calculated every 6 hours by Simply Wall St, details of our process are available on Github.
Analyst Sources
Beijing Easpring Material Technology CO.,LTD. is covered by 19 analysts. 5 of those analysts submitted the estimates of revenue or earnings used as inputs to our report. Analysts submissions are updated throughout the day.
| Analyst | Institution |
|---|---|
| Tao Zeng | China Galaxy Securities Co., Ltd. |
| Han Yu | China International Capital Corporation Limited |
| Chong Ao | Citic Securities Co., Ltd. |