Tianjin LVYIN Landscape and Ecology Construction Co., Ltd
SZSE:002887 Stock Report
Market Cap: CN¥2.2b
Tianjin LVYIN Landscape and Ecology Construction Valuation
Is 002887 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?
Valuation Score
3/6
Valuation Score 3/6
Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast
Share Price vs Fair Value
What is the Fair Price of 002887 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.
Below Fair Value: 002887 (CN¥7.27) is trading below our estimate of fair value (CN¥108.07)
Significantly Below Fair Value: 002887 is trading below fair value by more than 20%.
Key Valuation Metric
Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for 002887?
Key metric: As 002887 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.
The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for 002887. This is calculated by dividing 002887's market cap by their current
earnings.
What is 002887's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio
25.2x
Earnings
CN¥88.43m
Market Cap
CN¥2.22b
002887 key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: 002887 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (25.2x) compared to the CN Construction industry average (23.5x).
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio
What is 002887's PE Ratio
compared to its
Fair PE Ratio?
This is the expected PE Ratio taking into
account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins
and other risk factors.
002887 PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio
25.2x
Fair PE Ratio
13x
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: 002887 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (25.2x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (13x).
Analyst Price Targets
What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?
Analyst Forecast: Insufficient data to show price forecast.