Is UNIP6 undervalued compared to its fair value, analyst forecasts and its price relative to the market?
Valuation Score
3/6
Valuation Score 3/6
Below Fair Value
Significantly Below Fair Value
Price-To-Earnings vs Peers
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio
Analyst Forecast
Share Price vs Fair Value
What is the Fair Price of UNIP6 when looking at its future cash flows? For this estimate we use a Discounted Cash Flow model.
Below Fair Value: UNIP6 (R$49.45) is trading below our estimate of fair value (R$68.33)
Significantly Below Fair Value: UNIP6 is trading below fair value by more than 20%.
Key Valuation Metric
Which metric is best to use when looking at relative valuation for UNIP6?
Key metric: As UNIP6 is profitable we use its Price-To-Earnings Ratio for relative valuation analysis.
The above table shows the Price to Earnings ratio for UNIP6. This is calculated by dividing UNIP6's market cap by their current
earnings.
What is UNIP6's PE Ratio?
PE Ratio
13.1x
Earnings
R$423.49m
Market Cap
R$5.68b
UNIP6 key valuation metrics and ratios. From Price to Earnings, Price to Sales and Price to Book to Price to Earnings Growth Ratio, Enterprise Value and EBITDA.
Price-To-Earnings vs Industry: UNIP6 is good value based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (13.1x) compared to the Global Chemicals industry average (22x).
Price to Earnings Ratio vs Fair Ratio
What is UNIP6's PE Ratio
compared to its
Fair PE Ratio?
This is the expected PE Ratio taking into
account the company's forecast earnings growth, profit margins
and other risk factors.
UNIP6 PE Ratio vs Fair Ratio.
Fair Ratio
Current PE Ratio
13.1x
Fair PE Ratio
12x
Price-To-Earnings vs Fair Ratio: UNIP6 is expensive based on its Price-To-Earnings Ratio (13.1x) compared to the estimated Fair Price-To-Earnings Ratio (12x).
Analyst Price Targets
What is the analyst 12-month forecast and do we have any statistical confidence in the consensus price target?
Analyst Forecast: Target price is more than 20% higher than the current share price, but there are not enough analysts covering the stock to determine statistical confidence in agreement.