Stock Analysis

Is Citigold (ASX:CTO) Using Too Much Debt?

ASX:CTO
Source: Shutterstock

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Citigold Corporation Limited (ASX:CTO) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for Citigold

How Much Debt Does Citigold Carry?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2023 Citigold had debt of AU$3.04m, up from AU$1.68m in one year. However, it also had AU$219.6k in cash, and so its net debt is AU$2.82m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
ASX:CTO Debt to Equity History October 3rd 2023

How Strong Is Citigold's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Citigold had liabilities of AU$1.66m due within a year, and liabilities of AU$12.7m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of AU$219.6k and AU$391.0k worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total AU$13.7m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of AU$14.4m, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Citigold's use of debt. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is Citigold's earnings that will influence how the balance sheet holds up in the future. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Given its lack of meaningful operating revenue, investors are probably hoping that Citigold finds some valuable resources, before it runs out of money.

Caveat Emptor

Importantly, Citigold had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss over the last year. Its EBIT loss was a whopping AU$2.0m. When we look at that and recall the liabilities on its balance sheet, relative to cash, it seems unwise to us for the company to have any debt. Quite frankly we think the balance sheet is far from match-fit, although it could be improved with time. However, it doesn't help that it burned through AU$2.1m of cash over the last year. So suffice it to say we consider the stock very risky. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 5 warning signs for Citigold that you should be aware of before investing here.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Citigold is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.