Stock Analysis

Is GLG (ASX:GLE) Using Too Much Debt?

ASX:GLE
Source: Shutterstock

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that GLG Corp Ltd (ASX:GLE) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

See our latest analysis for GLG

What Is GLG's Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that GLG had US$49.3m of debt in December 2020, down from US$85.3m, one year before. However, it does have US$20.5m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$28.9m.

debt-equity-history-analysis
ASX:GLE Debt to Equity History March 24th 2021

How Healthy Is GLG's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that GLG had liabilities of US$64.6m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$21.2m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$20.5m as well as receivables valued at US$37.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$27.9m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$14.2m company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, GLG would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

GLG's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.3 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its strong interest cover of 14.8 times, makes us even more comfortable. Notably, GLG's EBIT launched higher than Elon Musk, gaining a whopping 216% on last year. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since GLG will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, GLG actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last three years. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.

Our View

GLG's level of total liabilities was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. There's no doubt that its ability to to cover its interest expense with its EBIT is pretty flash. When we consider all the factors mentioned above, we do feel a bit cautious about GLG's use of debt. While we appreciate debt can enhance returns on equity, we'd suggest that shareholders keep close watch on its debt levels, lest they increase. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for GLG (2 can't be ignored) you should be aware of.

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

If you decide to trade GLG, use the lowest-cost* platform that is rated #1 Overall by Barron’s, Interactive Brokers. Trade stocks, options, futures, forex, bonds and funds on 135 markets, all from a single integrated account. Promoted


New: Manage All Your Stock Portfolios in One Place

We've created the ultimate portfolio companion for stock investors, and it's free.

• Connect an unlimited number of Portfolios and see your total in one currency
• Be alerted to new Warning Signs or Risks via email or mobile
• Track the Fair Value of your stocks

Try a Demo Portfolio for Free

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
*Interactive Brokers Rated Lowest Cost Broker by StockBrokers.com Annual Online Review 2020


Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

About ASX:GLE

GLG

Engages in the manufacture, supply, and wholesale of knitwear, apparel, garments, and accessories in India, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Canada, Europe, Japan, Singapore, the United States, Cambodia, Malaysia, and internationally.

Slight with mediocre balance sheet.