BowFlex Inc.

OTCPK:BFXX.Q Voorraadrapport

Marktkapitalisatie: US$3.6k

This company is no longer active

The company may no longer be operating, as it may be out of business. Find out why through their latest events.

BowFlex Balans Gezondheid

Financiële gezondheid criteriumcontroles 2/6

BowFlex heeft een totaal eigen vermogen van $-23.8M en een totale schuld van $16.0M, wat de schuld-eigenvermogensverhouding op -67.2% brengt. De totale activa en totale passiva bedragen respectievelijk $86.3M en $110.1M.

Belangrijke informatie

-67.18%

Verhouding schuld/eigen vermogen

US$16.00m

Schuld

Rente dekkingsration/a
ContantUS$8.66m
Aandelen-US$23.81m
Totaal verplichtingenUS$110.12m
Totaal activaUS$86.31m

Recente financiële gezondheidsupdates

Recent updates

Analyseartikel • Oct 02

Nautilus (NYSE:NLS) Has Debt But No Earnings; Should You Worry?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility...
Analyseartikel • Aug 10

Should You Investigate Nautilus, Inc. (NYSE:NLS) At US$1.00?

Nautilus, Inc. ( NYSE:NLS ), might not be a large cap stock, but it received a lot of attention from a substantial...
Seeking Alpha • May 29

Nautilus: Cheap Price Does Not Mean Undervalued

Summary Nautilus fell from its high of $30 to $1.3. Demand is weakening, and Nautilus can’t do anything about it. The best play may be selling its children's brands. The price is near liquidation, which I believe is at around $0.85. Read the full article on Seeking Alpha
Analyseartikel • Feb 14

What You Need To Know About The Nautilus, Inc. (NYSE:NLS) Analyst Downgrade Today

The latest analyst coverage could presage a bad day for Nautilus, Inc. ( NYSE:NLS ), with the analysts making...
Analyseartikel • Feb 12

Nautilus (NYSE:NLS) Has Debt But No Earnings; Should You Worry?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility...
Seeking Alpha • Feb 09

Nautilus GAAP EPS of -$0.35 misses by $0.07, revenue of $98.08M misses by $5.42M

Nautilus press release (NYSE:NLS): Q3 GAAP EPS of -$0.35 misses by $0.07. Revenue of $98.08M (-33.4% Y/Y) misses by $5.42M. JRNY Total Members Reaches Approximately 450k with 88% Growth vs Q3 Fiscal 2022 Full Year 2023 The Company expects full year revenue of about $270 million compared to the previous range of $315 million to $365 million. The decline in revenue is primarily due to lower expectations in the Retail segment. The Company now expects full year Adjusted EBITDA1 loss (excluding restructuring costs) to be approximately $50 million compared to the prior range of Adjusted EBITDA(1) loss of between $30 million and $40 million. The Company is targeting JRNY Members to be approximately 500,000 at March 31, 2023.
Seeking Alpha • Oct 01

Nautilus: Buy For The Potential Buyout? Meh

Summary Nautilus recently announced that it was exploring strategic alternatives, including a potential sale of the entire company. As the company continues to lose ground and move into a deeper unhealthy financial position, the risks associated with an acquisition falling through are greater than M&A arbitrage, I believe. As a result, even if a purely speculative position may be okay, I don't believe the risk-reward profile fits a traditional M&A arbitrage and will not be holding a position. Earlier this month, Nautilus (NLS) announced that its board was discussing the potential sale of the company as part of them exploring strategic alternatives. While this way forward makes sense to me given the OPC (one product company) nature of the company, the real question is at what premium to their current share price, if at all, is this potential transaction going to take place? Let's explore the company and try to get a sense of that. Declining Company Fundamentals While the company's products are sound, they lack the hype factor of companies like Peloton (PTON), which caused them some headaches when trying to market the products to gyms and for personal use. Unsurprisingly, the company saw a surge in sales during the pandemic as a good chunk of the world remained locked down in one way or another and many sought out alternatives to gyms, which were mostly closed. The company's revenues surged from $309 million in 2019 to almost $665 million in 2021, more than doubling over a period of just 2 years. Since then, however, the company's sales have been declining as they both are unable to find that comparative growth, like most other companies in the field, as well as losing ground in services, or the 'interactive' part of their products to companies like Peloton and other private companies. In 2022, the company reported a decline in sales to just shy of $590 million and their current projections for the upcoming fiscal year call for a decline of almost 33% to $397 million and then a 9% increase in the following year to $434 million. Margins Not Too Hot Either With great pandemic-sales power, comes great operational expenses responsibilities. And with that higher sales volume came higher operational expenses, which rose from just over $100 million annually to over $160 million annually. This has, along with the slightly higher cost of revenues, caused the company to report a loss for fiscal 2022, and that loss is expected to deepen dramatically in the coming fiscal year. After reporting EPS of $2.67 in the year with record revenues, the company reported a loss of $(0.72) in the last fiscal year and is expected to report a much deeper loss this coming year. Based on the same analyst projections, the company is expected to report an EPS loss of $(2.56) for the coming fiscal year, followed by a 75% rise the following year, to a loss of $(0.68). But it's not like the company has some cash reserves to fall back on to maintain operational efficiency or fund operations through an acquisition. Low Cash, High Debt The company currently has one of its lowest ever cash positions at just $7.3 million in cash and equivalents, no short-term investment to divest from and no trading asset securities like previous years to generate any meaningful interest income. On top of that, they have one of their highest ever long-term debt position at $34.7 million, on which they are paying more than $1.6 million annually as interest rates rise in the United States and around the world as inflation runs relatively high. This means that the company will have to either fund operations in the coming few years through issuing more debt, making a buyout less appealing, or making equity offerings, which will further dilute shareholder value and subsequently lower the price per share of a buyout offer, if one may come. Buyout Opportunity - I Just Don't Know Given the fact that Nautilus is an established company with relationships with vendors and manufacturing facilities, it's clear that they CAN be a valuable asset to a private equity company that owns fitness gyms or has some fitness portfolio. I'm not so sure about a public company buyout like Peloton or others, since there's little incentive for that to happen. With the company's $100 million in inventory and still-solid $400 million range revenues projection for the coming year, there is certainly an incentive for someone who can significantly lower the costs of Nautilus and thus generate some profits in the coming year. But at what price? Earlier last year, apparel company Lululemon (LULU) announced it was buying Mirror, a home fitness company, for $500 million as part of its investment in overall fitness markets to expand its reach and avenues to sell their clothing. While I don't think Nautilus will fit their brand, other companies which are hurting from the volatility, which is the apparel and fitness markets, can benefit from having subscription-based services companies and hardware companies in their portfolio. While I'm not going to name names, it's clear that there is a market present for buyers for Nautilus, whether it be athletic companies, athletic apparel companies or private equity with fitness portfolios looking to enhance their reach. Is It Worth A Speculative Buy? It's hard to set a value on the company's worth to a buyer without knowing the portfolio they're trying to expand, but with a book value hovering around $3 per share and an enterprise value of around $100 million, the highest possible potential value the company has is probably around double where it is now. However, there's going to be a discount for the company given their higher debt load as a percentage of the value as well as the fact they're not expected to make anything resembling a profit for quite some time.
Seeking Alpha • Aug 09

Nautilus GAAP EPS of -$1.92 misses by $1.20, revenue of $54.82M beats by $4.16M

Nautilus press release (NYSE:NLS): Q1 GAAP EPS of -$1.92 misses by $1.20. Revenue of $54.82M (-70.3% Y/Y) beats by $4.16M. Gross profit margins were 12.7% compared to 30.1% last year. The 17.4 ppt decrease in gross margins was primarily due to increased discounting (-8 ppts), unfavorable logistics overhead absorption (-8 ppts), and increased investments in JRNY (-4 ppts), offset by improvement in other costs (3 ppts). Reiterates FY 2022 Guidance: The company expects full year revenue of between $380 million and $460 million vs. consensus of $398.60 million. Gross margins for the second half of the year are expected to be in the range of 27% to 30%. The company expects to deliver positive Adjusted EBITDA for the 2nd half of FY 2023. As a result, the Company expects full year Adjusted EBITDA loss of between $25 million and $35 million. Shares -6%.

Analyse van de financiële positie

Kortlopende schulden: BFXX.Q heeft een negatief eigen vermogen, wat een ernstiger situatie is dan dat kortetermijnactiva de kortetermijnschulden niet dekken.

Langlopende schulden: BFXX.Q heeft een negatief eigen vermogen, wat een ernstiger situatie is dan wanneer de kortetermijnactiva de langetermijnschulden niet dekken.

Schuld/ eigen vermogen geschiedenis en analyse

Schuldniveau: BFXX.Q heeft negatief eigen vermogen, wat een ernstiger situatie is dan een hoog schuldenniveau.

Schuld verminderen: BFXX.Q heeft een negatief eigen vermogen, dus we hoeven niet te controleren of de schuld in de loop van de tijd is afgenomen.

Balans

Analyse van de cashflow

Voor bedrijven die in het verleden gemiddeld verliesgevend zijn geweest, beoordelen we of ze ten minste 1 jaar kasstroom hebben.

Stabiele cash runway: Terwijl het verlieslatende BFXX.Q voldoende cash runway heeft voor meer dan 3 jaar, als het zijn huidige positieve vrije kasstroom-niveau behoudt.

Voorspelling contante baan: BFXX.Q is verlieslatend, maar heeft voldoende kasmiddelen voor meer dan 3 jaar, zelfs bij een positieve vrije kasstroom die met 5.1 % per jaar krimpt.

Ontdek gezonde bedrijven

7D

1Y

7D

1Y

7D

1Y

Bedrijfsanalyse en status van financiële gegevens

GegevensLaatst bijgewerkt (UTC-tijd)
Bedrijfsanalyse2024/08/19 01:05
Aandelenkoers aan het einde van de dag2024/08/19 00:00
Inkomsten2024/03/31
Jaarlijkse inkomsten2024/03/31

Gegevensbronnen

De gegevens die gebruikt zijn in onze bedrijfsanalyse zijn afkomstig van S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. De volgende gegevens worden gebruikt in ons analysemodel om dit rapport te genereren. De gegevens zijn genormaliseerd, waardoor er een vertraging kan optreden voordat de bron beschikbaar is.

PakketGegevensTijdframeVoorbeeld Amerikaanse bron *
Financiële gegevens bedrijf10 jaar
  • Resultatenrekening
  • Kasstroomoverzicht
  • Balans
Consensus schattingen analisten+3 jaar
  • Financiële prognoses
  • Koersdoelen analisten
Marktprijzen30 jaar
  • Aandelenprijzen
  • Dividenden, splitsingen en acties
Eigendom10 jaar
  • Top aandeelhouders
  • Handel met voorkennis
Beheer10 jaar
  • Leiderschapsteam
  • Raad van bestuur
Belangrijkste ontwikkelingen10 jaar
  • Bedrijfsaankondigingen

* Voorbeeld voor effecten uit de VS, voor niet-Amerikaanse effecten worden gelijkwaardige formulieren en bronnen gebruikt.

Tenzij anders vermeld zijn alle financiële gegevens gebaseerd op een jaarperiode, maar worden ze elk kwartaal bijgewerkt. Dit staat bekend als Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) of Last Twelve Month (LTM) gegevens. Meer informatie.

Analysemodel en Snowflake

Details van het analysemodel dat is gebruikt om dit rapport te genereren zijn beschikbaar op onze Github-pagina. We hebben ook handleidingen over hoe je onze rapporten kunt gebruiken en tutorials op YouTube.

Leer meer over het team van wereldklasse dat het Simply Wall St-analysemodel heeft ontworpen en gebouwd.

Industrie en sector

Onze industrie- en sectormetrics worden elke 6 uur berekend door Simply Wall St, details van ons proces zijn beschikbaar op Github.

Bronnen van analisten

BowFlex Inc. wordt gevolgd door 11 analisten. 0 van deze analisten hebben de schattingen van de omzet of winst ingediend die zijn gebruikt als input voor ons rapport. Inzendingen van analisten worden de hele dag door bijgewerkt.

AnalistInstelling
Rommel DionisioAegis Capital Corporation
Eric WoldB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Steven DyerCraig-Hallum Capital Group LLC