Is GW Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:GWPH) Using Debt In A Risky Way?

    Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that GW Pharmaceuticals plc (NASDAQ:GWPH) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

    Advertisement

    Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

    Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

    View our latest analysis for GW Pharmaceuticals

    What Is GW Pharmaceuticals's Debt?

    The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that GW Pharmaceuticals had debt of US$9.69m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from US$17.0m over a year. But it also has US$583.7m in cash to offset that, meaning it has US$574.0m net cash.

    NasdaqGM:GWPH Historical Debt, August 20th 2019
    NasdaqGM:GWPH Historical Debt, August 20th 2019

    A Look At GW Pharmaceuticals's Liabilities

    According to the last reported balance sheet, GW Pharmaceuticals had liabilities of US$83.9m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$29.9m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had US$583.7m in cash and US$32.1m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it actually has US$501.9m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

    This surplus suggests that GW Pharmaceuticals has a conservative balance sheet, and could probably eliminate its debt without much difficulty. Succinctly put, GW Pharmaceuticals boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load! The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if GW Pharmaceuticals can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

    Over 12 months, GW Pharmaceuticals reported revenue of US$132m, which is a gain of 674%. When it comes to revenue growth, that's like nailing the game winning 3-pointer!

    So How Risky Is GW Pharmaceuticals?

    By their very nature companies that are losing money are more risky than those with a long history of profitability. And the fact is that over the last twelve months GW Pharmaceuticals lost money at the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) line. And over the same period it saw negative free cash outflow of US$372m and booked a US$104m accounting loss. But at least it has US$584m on the balance sheet to spend on growth, near-term. Importantly, GW Pharmaceuticals's revenue growth is hot to trot. High growth pre-profit companies may well be risky, but they can also offer great rewards. For riskier companies like GW Pharmaceuticals I always like to keep an eye on the long term profit and revenue trends. Fortunately, you can click to see our interactive graph of its profit, revenue, and operating cashflow.

    At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

    We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

    If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

    Advertisement

    Weekly Picks

    DA
    davidlsander
    OPTH logo
    davidlsander on Optimi Health ·

    OPTH: A licensed manufacturer already selling MDMA while peers still wait on trials

    Fair Value:US$1261.0% undervalued
    15 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    2 users have liked this narrative
    FU
    VRT logo
    FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

    The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

    Fair Value:US$45037.4% undervalued
    14 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    4 users have liked this narrative
    JO
    John_Eric
    SPXC logo
    John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

    I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

    Fair Value:US$2036.8% overvalued
    7 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    3 users have liked this narrative
    TR
    tripledub
    GQG logo
    tripledub on GQG Partners ·

    The Cheap Genius Problem

    Fair Value:AU$2.4540.0% undervalued
    17 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    18 users have liked this narrative

    Updated Narratives

    NE
    NeuralAlpha
    NVDA logo
    NeuralAlpha on NVIDIA ·

    NVIDIA: The Indispensable Backbone of the AI Revolution

    Fair Value:US$25013.0% undervalued
    20 users have followed this narrative
    4 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    CO
    CSCO logo
    CoksiBoy on Cisco Systems ·

    AI Workforce Rollout

    Fair Value:US$14516.9% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative
    RO
    RockeTeller
    AUAU logo
    RockeTeller on A2 Gold ·

    Nevada Gold Silver Giant: 1.4Moz Gold + 20Moz Silver Potential, Kinross-Backed Nevada Play Exploding?

    Fair Value:CA$4.2484.2% undervalued
    1 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    0 users have liked this narrative

    Popular Narratives

    OS
    oscargarcia
    NVDA logo
    oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

    The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

    Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
    297 users have followed this narrative
    9 users have commented on this narrative
    16 users have liked this narrative
    CU
    MSFT logo
    CubanEros on Microsoft ·

    A wonderful business at reasonable price.

    Fair Value:US$419.9120.0% overvalued
    159 users have followed this narrative
    0 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative
    KI
    AMZN logo
    KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

    Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

    Fair Value:US$475.0942.7% undervalued
    178 users have followed this narrative
    1 users have commented on this narrative
    8 users have liked this narrative

    Trending Discussion

    M0
    PONY logo
    m00sekateer on Pony AI ·

    Checked it. The arithmetic is fine; the inputs aren't, and the conclusion doesn't follow even if they were.1. Fare. $7 is a US robotaxi price. Pony's record peak day in Shenzhen (22 March 2026) was RMB394 net revenue per Gen-7 vehicle on 25 orders — about US$2.20 per order. You're roughly 3x high.2. Utilisation. 25 orders/day is Pony's all-time single-day high, not an average, and you then run it 365 days with zero downtime for charging, cleaning, maintenance, weather or geofence interruption.Corrected, the best day Pony has ever recorded yields ~US$55/day. On $43k of hardware that's ~26 months of gross revenue, before any operating cost. The reported actuals agree: FY2025 robotaxi services revenue US$16.6m on a fleet just past 1,000 units; Q1 2026 US$8.6m with the fleet above 1,700 — call it US$20–25k per vehicle per year against your $63,875.3. The caveat is the whole argument. You flag "not including operational costs (people costs)" and then set it aside. Remote safety operators, platform commissions, charging, insurance, cleaning, depot and maintenance are what determine whether a robotaxi contributes anything at all.4. Payback isn't profitability. Q1 2026: 16.2% gross margin on US$34.3m revenue, US$63.9m of opex, US$53.5m net loss. Marginal hardware payback says nothing about R&D, mapping, licensing or overhead.5. Falling BOM cuts both ways. Pony targets sub-RMB230k (~US$34k) total vehicle cost for 2027. Great for new units, bad for the residual value of fleets already deployed on a five-year depreciation schedule.What you get right: the cost trajectory is real, and city-wide UE breakeven in Guangzhou (Nov 2025) and Shenzhen (Feb 2026) is a genuine milestone. But that is contribution-margin breakeven per trip — not "cracked the per-unit cost," and not an 8-month payback. Your post predates all of it; the data has since landed, and it's less favourable on revenue per vehicle than the model assumed.

    0
    |
    0