Talphera 과거 순이익 실적
과거 기준 점검 0/6
Talphera 의 수입은 연평균 -6.6%의 비율로 감소해 온 반면, Pharmaceuticals 산업은 연평균 9.7%의 비율로 증가했습니다. 매출은 연평균 58.5%의 비율로 감소해 왔습니다.
핵심 정보
-6.62%
순이익 성장률
14.21%
주당순이익(EPS) 성장률
| Pharmaceuticals 산업 성장률 | 5.95% |
| 매출 성장률 | -58.53% |
| 자기자본이익률 | -77.13% |
| 순이익률 | -1,425,300.00% |
| 최근 순이익 업데이트 | 31 Mar 2026 |
최근 과거 실적 업데이트
Recent updates
Seeking Alpha • Aug 18
AcelRx: The Catalogue Of Catalysts - Including A Big One That Will Do Investors Well
AcelRx's 2Q22 Earnings Release and Call provided little tangible news. However, it becomes more and more obvious that ACRX’s management is fully shifting the focus from commercial DSUVIA to launching the Syringes products and Niyad. In light of the ongoing cash burn, the prospects of this pivoting are highly dependent on the terms of the pending DSUVIA out-licensing agreements. I believe the market is underestimating the potential of the deal so that ACRX still has substantial short-term upside potential. This is my quarterly update of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals (ACRX) - on the one hand. And in addition it is my contribution to seeking Alpha's current article competition around Stocks with a Catalyst. Because frankly, I can't think of any position in my portfolio for which taking such a perspective would be a better fit. This article is structured as follows: Quick overview of ACRX' business - readers familiar with the company or my previous extended coverage may simply skip it. Discussion of the most recent developments, this time from a catalyst perspective - changing the point of view for a company long covered is generally a useful technique Discussion of the "Elephant in the Room", i.e. the one big catalyst, being the pending deal, or even deals, for the marketing rights of DSUVIA in the US (or even beyond) There will be, and has to come, as discussed below, a major deal for the company. After my last article with a Neutral rating I added to my position, because meanwhile I concluded that there still is substantial upside from a stock price of about USD 0.31 if ACRX manages to seal a decent deal. This article summarizes why I believe such deal will come and what I believe the resulting favorable valuation impact to be. Throughout the remaining discussion, EC refers to the 2q22 Earnings Call of ACRX. ACRX Business Overview ACRX is a pharmaceutical company operating in the space of supervised medical settings, i.e. hospitals, ASCs (Ambulatory Surgical Centers), and procedural suites, such as individual dental or plastic surgeons. It does not sell its products to pharmacies or drug stores. Currently, ACRX' active products are limited to sublingual sufentanil tablets (or SST). The main product is called DSUVIA and is sold in the US. It is an opioid based analgetic for use against acute moderate to severe pain. It is sold to the above mentioned supervised medical institutions (referred to as Commercial Sales by management), and also to the DoD (DoD Sales), which sponsored DSUVIA's development and is anticipated to become the largest single customer in the short-term by supplying SKOs (sets, kits, and outfits) of the US Army with DSUVIA for battlefield pain management. A detailed discussion of the features of DSUVIA, or more generally SST, can be found here. DSUVIA is approved in Europe under the name DZUVEO, and ACRX partnered with private French company Aguettant to commercialise DZUVEAU in this territory. ACRX confirmed during the EC that DZUVEOs market launch is scheduled for the third quarter of 2022. DZUVEO was sold in Europe under the name Zalviso for use through SDA (single dose applicators), but the private German commercialisation partner Grünenthal cancelled the sales agreement. Zalviso is not yet approved by the FDA for commercialisation in the US - and as discussed below, ACRX management announced during the EC that they dropped the plan to apply for approval any time soon. Further, ACRX has licensed two syringes products with Aguettant for commercialisation by ACRX in the US. These products (the Syringes) are not yet FDA approved. The limited news to report on the progress of the approval process are discussed below. The syringes provide ephedrine and phenylephrine, substances used to regulate severe side effects that come with analgesia, i.e. products like DSUVIA. Readers more interested in these substances and Aguettant find a detailed discussion here. Finally, in January 2022 ACRX completed the acquisition of private Lowell Therapeutics, Inc. (hereafter: Lowell). Details of the transaction are discussed here. Lowell developed a product called Niyad, a Nafamostat-based regional anticoagulant for dialysis circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients in the hospital. Niyad is not approved by the FDA in the US. Catalysts for Cynics I am a Mathematician and my profession is notorious for taking the formal way. So, here we go by first recalling the definition of a catalyst, according to Wikipedia: Catalysis is the process of increasing the rate of a chemical reaction by adding a substance known as a catalyst. Now, combining this definition with the 10-chart for ACRX stock printed below may cause cynics to state that there is actually no need for acceleration of what is going on with the company: Seeking Alpha The reasons for this historic development are easy to list: DSUVIA, or SST, to be more precise, were viewed by management, including Dr. Pamela Palmer, Chief Medical Officer as a game-change in the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain. However, since the final approval in late 2018 sales have lagged any management forecast by orders of magnitude. I have discussed candidates for reasons in depth in this article - they range from what was most likely a mis-focus initially on Emergency Room use all the way to COVID-19, which absorbed hospital capacity by requiring treatment of unprecedented numbers of people suffering from a lethal and highly contagious lung disease and left too little space for changing the standard of care in pain management. The result is obvious: High cash burn, ongoing dilution and fading investor trust. To be very clear: Per the end of 2q22, ACRX had USD 27 million of cash, USD 10 million of debt due until May 2023 and a quarterly cash burn of some USD 8 million. None of the resulting obvious issues is needed at a higher dose or at an increased rate. On the other hand, it seems that investors have priced in most of the essentially bad news that came in recently: First, ACRX received its second and final letter from NASDAQ, clarifying that ACRX stock will be delisted if, very informally, the stock price does not go back up to USD 1.00 at least. As a result, ACRX started to prepare investors for an upcoming reverse stock-split by announcing a dedicated special shareholder meeting for September 23, 2022. In theory, the number of shares outstanding should not affect the equity's market capitalization. However, since such reverse stock split is usually the result of poor returns, which are often the result of poor operational performance, it frequently accelerates the decline in stock price - thereby essentially becoming a catalyst. I usually do not comment short-term market movements, or the lack thereof, but is seems plausible that anyone saw this reverse split coming, so market reaction wasn't significant - at least in comparison to other movements that I will discuss below. In any case, most likely, we will witness a reverse stock split sometime in October / November. For the sake of completeness, it is necessary to mention one piece of information that ACRX management shared during the EC. The company stopped all efforts for the Zalviso US-approval process with the FDA. A while back, this may have triggered strong investor reaction, but I guess this makes sense: As I have discussed before, the main reason is that most likely hospitals want to get sound experience with SST before handing it out to patients (in supervised medical settings, that is) through a dispensing device. Bottom-line is that a lot went wrong during the last 3-4 years, so that certain unfavorable news just don't do the catalyst job. Accordingly, from here on I will focus on catalysts with upside potential. Slow and Lame Catalysts There are other things going on at ACRX that may appear huge, but did not trigger severe reactions. Zalviso Returning to Zalviso for example: It was fully approved in the EU, and ACRX sold a massive amount of expected Royalty payments it expected to receive to a third party (who, too, had an optimistic view on the market potential). The deal was non-recourse, i.e. without royalty payments there was no liability by ACRX to repay the financing. The claim changed hands a couple of times, and the latest owner agreed with ACRX to bury the whole story, or in more formal terms per ACRX' CFO's words during the EC: $84.1 million gain related to the extinguishment of the royalty monetization agreement that was held by SWK. This termination eliminates any further contractual obligation associated with the royalty monetization agreement and eliminates the corresponding liability previously recorded on our balance sheet. A USD 80 million gain for a company with a market cap of some USD 40 million - this might kick-off fireworks for other companies, but was a nil event instead for ACRX, since this was obvious from the financial reporting in the past (sometimes markets do digest information efficiently). And there is probably other near-term news to come that will not change an awful lot for investors in the short-term, but does represent milestones that I expect to contribute positively over the long term: DZUVEO Launch First, there is the formal DZUVEO launch in Europe by Aguettant, expected during the remainder of 3q22. At the EC, ACRX management reported first deliveries of DSUVIA to Europe, so things are developing. It goes without saying that we still need to wait for indications of the level of commercial adoption of DZUVEO in Europe. COVID is not gone by any means, and the slow adoption of DSUVIA in the US will not be of big help with marketing overseas. On the other hand, there were no real-world studies published at the time of the DSUVIA US-launch demonstrating the use cases for SST. And by now, Aguettant know which surgical specialties have been adopting easily in the US, so they know where to start themselves. Plus, things are different in Europe with regards to opioid use: We did not suffer from ruthless pharma companies pushing medication into the hands of laymen, who had no idea - and where actively mislead - about the addictiveness of these substances. On the downside from a pharma company's view, drug margins are much lower in Europe. Bottom-line is that we need to wait for another couple of quarters before we get a clear idea of the earnings potential from this market. ACRX Pivot Over the last 12 months, ACRX added two late stage assets for the US market: the Syringes and Niyad / Nafamostat. As I will discuss below, these are most likely not mere additions to the asset portfolio, but may in fact be the actual future of ACRX. Per management commentary during the EC: With two planned NDA filings in 2022, we expect our prefilled syringes will be our next FDA-approved products that a commercial launch could occur as soon as next year And (emphasis added): (…) we've prioritized our focus on Niyad, our first Nafamostat product, which is being developed for use in the U.S. as an anticoagulant for extracorporeal circuits, such as for use during dialysis. The entire EC made clear that ACRX is moving away from DSUVIA: No more REMS certification or FA (Formulary Approval) numbers were given, despite this being a main KPI historically. DSUVIA sales increased a "meagre" 18% quarter-over-quarter, but this wasn't anyone's focus anymore (including analysts) The DSUVIA sales efforts at ACRX are left with a team of less than ten purely "virtual" sales people solely addressing procedural suites (as opposed to hospitals and ASCs, the initial focus) I continue to assume that ACRX will retain the relationship with the DoD, given the long history of collaboration between the two parties. And comments made during the call seem to indicate that the procedural suites business and / or certain surgical specialties will stay with ACRX, too, see e.g. this comment during the EC (with "them" being maxillofacial and plastics clinics groups): I think it's important that we've been approached by them (…). (….) they would have a significant impact on our sales moving forward without quoting you a number. They would be our largest accounts. It is good to see for many reasons that there is interest for DSUVIA, and that healthcare providers learn of this through word-of-mouth, especially in the plastics specialty. This will help with the DZUVEO launch and it should also help with negotiating the Big One, discussed below. In any case, we can already observe how management attention is turned away from significant parts of the DSUVIA market. For the Syringes and Niyad, the imminent tasks are all about FDA approvals. I have summarized the road ahead before for both Syringes and Niyad. If things go according to management plan, the first revenue may come in late 2023. Say that is 6 quarters from now, this makes for a cash need of some USD 50 million (being 6 * 8). Plus, there will be external cost for the Niyad approval process, as well as the USD 10 million of debt to repay. The grand total is a cash need of some USD 80 million, of which ACRX held some USD 27 million per the end of 2q22, which I will consider additional safety. We will come back to this (ballpark) number soon. Small Catalysts That was many words about things that did not cause or most likely will not cause a huge effect on ACRX' share price in the short-term. Now it is time to look at those events that may in fact turn the fate at a faster pace. Before addressing the one big trigger that should be on any investors' mind, let's look first at some 2nd tier, but still relevant items. DoD Order (Non-commercial Business) ACRX shareholders have been waiting for years to hear about a huge order from the DoD. As a quick reminder, DSUVIA development was funded to a substantial degree by the DoD, supporting its search for appropriate battlefield pain management. It took a while, but by now the US Army went through virtually all formal steps (including the often quoted Milestone C meeting) required for deploying the SKOs (Sets, Kits and Outfits) of their troops with DSUVIA. ACRX management's estimate for the revenue from initial deployment of the SKOs to all branches of the military is USD 30 million, but we haven't seen purchases anywhere near that level to-date. Apparently, the DoD is a special customer, and there is little ACRX management can do to make them move faster. There were some smaller orders in almost any of the previous quarters - representing the non-commercial share of Revenue as reported by ACRX - most probably for studies conducted by the Army.Seeking Alpha • Jun 06
AcelRx Pharmaceuticals: Finally, Plan B
On May 16, 2022 ACRX announced the company was in active discussions with potential commercial partners to take on DSUVIA. In such case, ACRX would essentially give up the main asset on which its story was built on so far. The company has acquired further assets over the past twelve months, ensuring a basis for further revenue. Without knowledge of the DSUVIA deal it is hard to assess the prospect, so I retain a Neutral rating with a tilt to Buy, as I believe in some short-term upside potential.Seeking Alpha • Mar 16
AcelRx Pharmaceuticals: Making Sense Of The Q4 Numbers
ACRX 4q21 revenue numbers confused many readers of the earnings release. Revenue numbers are better – and more insightful – than they appear at first glance. Nonetheless, the strong market sell-off seems justified due to further decreasing earnings visibility and strong liquidity concerns.Seeking Alpha • Jan 14
AcelRx Pharmaceuticals: The Fog Is Getting Thicker
DSUVIA sales continue to lag expectations. Visibility of earnings and net cash further reduced by Lowell acquisition which is hard to assess at this stage. I am still convinced of the excellent prospects of DSUVIA in particular, but less visibility means higher risk premium, means lower rating.Seeking Alpha • Jan 05
AcelRx: Battered And Bruised But Ready For Recovery In 2022
AcelRx continues to be an abysmal investment as the company's flagship product DSUVIA has struggled to gain traction in the middle of COVID-19 headwinds. The lack of DoD orders are hurting the company’s quarterly earnings. Consequently, the share price has been crushed and the company's market. Despite the company's lackluster performance, I have been slowly accumulating ACRX with the belief the market has taken the selling too far and has discounted the company’s upside prospects. I intend to review the company's Q3 earnings and go over the details of the Lowell Therapeutics acquisition. In addition, I will attempt to find a discounted valuation to be used as my target price or buy threshold. I discuss my plans for my ACRX position in 2022.Seeking Alpha • Oct 02
AcelRx Pharmaceuticals: Is Wayne Gretzky Right Or The Puck?
DSUVIA 2q21 revenues were below my and market expectations. But management provided further details regarding the Europe out-licensing agreement for DSUVIA and the in-licensing agreements. And Formulary Approvals have picked up substantially also indicating gradually increasing interest in the product. Management mentioned discussions about a DSUVIA out-licensing to the Asia-Pacific region.Seeking Alpha • Jul 27
AcelRx Pharmaceuticals: How The Licensing Agreements Could Become A Shot In The Arm
On July 14, 2021 ACRX announced it had entered into two licensing agreements. The agreements make a lot of commercial sense, next to the fun fact of ACRX partnering with a syringe specialist. But there are also significant risks and uncertainties that make it hard at this stage to predict the exact benefits of the agreements.분석 기사 • Jun 11
Shareholders May Find It Hard To Justify Increasing AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ACRX) CEO Compensation For Now
The underwhelming share price performance of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( NASDAQ:ACRX ) in the past three years would...매출 및 비용 세부 내역
매출 및 비용 세부 내역
Talphera가 돈을 벌고 사용하는 방법. 최근 발표된 LTM 실적 기준.
순이익 및 매출 추이
| 날짜 | 매출 | 순이익 | 일반관리비 | 연구개발비 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Mar 26 | 0 | -14 | 8 | 6 |
| 31 Dec 25 | 0 | -14 | 7 | 6 |
| 30 Sep 25 | 0 | -12 | 7 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 25 | 0 | -11 | 7 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 25 | 0 | -12 | 8 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 24 | 0 | -13 | 9 | 6 |
| 30 Sep 24 | 0 | -16 | 10 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 24 | 0 | -14 | 10 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 24 | 1 | -14 | 11 | 1 |
| 31 Dec 23 | 1 | -10 | 12 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 23 | 0 | -11 | 14 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 23 | 0 | -14 | 16 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 23 | 0 | 58 | 17 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 22 | 0 | 54 | 17 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 22 | -2 | 69 | 2 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 22 | -1 | 65 | 7 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 22 | 2 | -31 | 27 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 21 | 0 | -17 | 15 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 21 | 4 | -36 | 33 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 21 | 3 | -37 | 30 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 21 | 6 | -33 | 31 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 20 | 5 | -40 | 36 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 20 | 5 | -46 | 41 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 20 | 4 | -50 | 46 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 20 | 2 | -55 | 48 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 19 | 2 | -53 | 45 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 19 | 2 | -51 | 40 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 19 | 2 | -51 | 34 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 19 | 2 | -49 | 27 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 18 | 2 | -47 | 21 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 18 | 2 | -44 | 17 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 18 | 3 | -45 | 16 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 18 | 5 | -48 | 16 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 17 | 8 | -52 | 17 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 17 | 14 | -51 | 17 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 17 | 16 | -50 | 17 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 17 | 17 | -48 | 16 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 16 | 17 | -43 | 16 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 16 | 13 | -44 | 16 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 16 | 25 | -28 | 14 | 0 |
| 31 Mar 16 | 22 | -25 | 13 | 0 |
| 31 Dec 15 | 19 | -24 | 14 | 0 |
| 30 Sep 15 | 18 | -28 | 15 | 0 |
| 30 Jun 15 | 7 | -32 | 17 | 0 |
양질의 수익: TLPH 은(는) 현재 수익성이 없습니다.
이익 마진 증가: TLPH는 현재 수익성이 없습니다.
잉여현금흐름 대비 순이익 분석
과거 순이익 성장 분석
수익추이: TLPH은 수익성이 없으며 지난 5년 동안 손실이 연평균 6.6% 증가했습니다.
성장 가속화: 현재 수익성이 없어 지난 1년간 TLPH의 수익 성장률을 5년 평균과 비교할 수 없습니다.
수익 대 산업: TLPH은 수익성이 없어 지난 해 수익 성장률을 Pharmaceuticals 업계(-5%)와 비교하기 어렵습니다.
자기자본이익률
높은 ROE: TLPH는 현재 수익성이 없으므로 자본 수익률이 음수(-77.14%)입니다.
총자산이익률
투하자본수익률
우수한 과거 실적 기업을 찾아보세요
기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태
| 데이터 | 최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간) |
|---|---|
| 기업 분석 | 2026/05/22 03:18 |
| 종가 | 2026/05/22 00:00 |
| 수익 | 2026/03/31 |
| 연간 수익 | 2025/12/31 |
데이터 소스
당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.
| 패키지 | 데이터 | 기간 | 미국 소스 예시 * |
|---|---|---|---|
| 기업 재무제표 | 10년 |
| |
| 분석가 컨센서스 추정치 | +3년 |
|
|
| 시장 가격 | 30년 |
| |
| 지분 구조 | 10년 |
| |
| 경영진 | 10년 |
| |
| 주요 개발 | 10년 |
|
* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.
별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.
분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크
이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델에 대한 자세한 내용은 당사의 Github 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 활용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공합니다.
Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.
산업 및 섹터 지표
산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.
분석가 소스
Talphera, Inc.는 15명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 2명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.
| 분석가 | 기관 |
|---|---|
| James Molloy | Alliance Global Partners |
| David Buck | B. Riley Securities, Inc. |
| Andrew D'Silva | B. Riley Securities, Inc. |