Forte Biosciences, Inc.

NasdaqCM:FBRX 주식 리포트

시가총액: US$1.9b

Forte Biosciences 경영진

경영진 기준 점검 2/4

Forte Biosciences CEO는 Paul A. Wagner, Jan2018 에 임명되었습니다 의 임기는 8.5 년입니다. 총 연간 보상은 $7.36M, 9.1% 급여 및 90.9% 보너스(회사 주식 및 옵션 포함)로 구성됩니다. 는 $6.58M 가치에 해당하는 회사 주식의 0.35% 직접 소유합니다. 경영진과 이사회의 평균 재임 기간은 5.3 년과 3.9 년입니다.

핵심 정보

Paul A. Wagner

최고경영자

US$7.4m

총 보수

CEO 급여 비율9.11%
CEO 재임 기간8.5yrs
CEO 지분 보유율0.3%
경영진 평균 재임 기간5.3yrs
이사회 평균 재임 기간3.9yrs

최근 경영진 업데이트

Recent updates

분석 기사 Nov 11

We're Not Very Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, Forte Biosciences...
분석 기사 Apr 19

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, although Amazon.com made...
분석 기사 Jul 17

We're A Little Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
분석 기사 Mar 14

Is Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Just because a business does not make any money, does not mean that the stock will go down. For example, although...
Seeking Alpha Aug 24

Large Forte Biosciences shareholder scolds company board of directors

Funicular Funds, which owns 8% of the outstanding shares of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX), excoriated the company's board of directors in a letter over a recent capital raise. In an SEC filing, Funicular said the letter addressed the "Board’s failure to address the legitimate concerns previously raised by stockholders and its decision to embark on a value-destructive, scorched-earth path with a dilutive and unnecessary capital raise, without so much as an explanation for its actions." Funicular is asking to establish a committee of independent directors to investigate shareholder concerns. In July, a pair of large shareholders demanded changes at Forte (FBRX), including a suggestion that the company liquidate.
분석 기사 Aug 17

We're Hopeful That Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Will Use Its Cash Wisely

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining...
Seeking Alpha Aug 16

Forte Biosciences: Lots Of Clinical Risk Ahead And A Questionable Business Plan

FB-401, the lead asset failed in clinical trials. The company has one very early-stage asset they intend to move forward in the clinic, FB-102. Investors are likely to encounter dilution, a high degree of clinical risk and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether FB-401 has any advantages over other therapeutics. Summary Creativity is not my strength so I am reusing the title from an article that I wrote a few months back about Vyne Therapeutics, another dermatology company. The shares of Vyne have fallen 60% since then. The story is at Forte is essentially the same and all too common in biotech. Vyne and Forte both experienced setbacks, institutional investors sold and long term investors have fared poorly. Most importantly, for both companies, there is a suboptimal plan to move forward that exposes investors to a high degree of clinical risk, requires hundreds of millions of capital and has a low chance of rewarding investors in a manner commensurate with this outsized risk. I will outline a few reasons I rate Forte Biosciences (FBRX) a SELL Institutional Investors Major institutional investors have sold and cut their losses. Forte Biosciences had an enviable roster of professional investors including BVF, Orbimed and Perceptive Advisors. These are seasoned investors with a staff of PhD/MDs who are highly capable of assessing the future likelihood of success. All three funds sold their entire stake in the company. This is not always the case after a clinical failure. There are many cases where institutional investors increase their stake at a low price. Three institutional investors selling their entire stake strongly suggests these professionals do not see a bright future. For an unprofitable biotech company, institutional investors are an important source of capital. Funding an unprofitable biotech in the capital markets is very challenging currently. It is not clear Forte will be able to obtain future funding and if they do, terms will likely be unfavorable. What is clear is they have very limited cash ($38.5 m currently) and they will need hundreds of million to develop the new molecule. In fact, they have a shelf registration in place. Investors should expect substantial dilution. The Plan Forward The asset the company intends to move forward after the failure of FB-401 in atopic dermatitis is FB-102. Given this asset is in the very early stages of testing, prudence dictates an assessment as to whether the risk is worth the potential reward. This molecule may enter the clinic for testing as late as 2024. The company's presentation noted development plans in graft versus host disease (GvHD), vitiligo and alopecia areata which represent combined markets of over $6 billion. Each indication will require separate clinical trials to prove safety and efficacy adding substantially to the cost of development. Each of these indications has standard of care treatments. The company notes an unmet medical need. GvHD is a disease where there is a legitimate unmet need but there are other companies much further along in testing including Seres Therapeutics (MCRB) and MaaT Pharma. The unmet need may be satisfied by these entrants and MaaT has already produced favorable safety and efficacy data. Alopecia and vitiligo have very effective treatments currently-JAK inhibitors. The company noted the safety profile of JAK inhibitors. Opzelura is a topical JAK and most Doctors consider the safety profile of the cream to be of no concern whatsoever. In alopecia, where oral JAKS are approved, the safety and efficacy data for all 3 JAK inhibitors (Pfizer, Lilly and Concert) has been favorable but there is a black box warning. From an efficacy standpoint, there is no unmet need. From a safety standpoint, the mechanism of action and side effect profile are related. The JAK inhibitors work in vitiligo and alopecia areata by suppressing the immune system. There is nothing to suggest FB-102 can achieve the suppression of the immune system required for efficacy without the same safety issues. Investors are going to spend hundreds of million dollars developing treatments in indications where there are either treatments approved or assets years ahead of Forte's molecule, FB-102. Investors are taking on a huge amount of risk to enter crowded markets with little assurance of any competitive advantage. Of course, there is also the possibility the molecule does not show efficacy or adequate safety and needs to abandoned leaving Forte with no assets. To make development of FB-102 worthwhile, it would have to offer a benefit over existing treatments. The company presentation does not include the mechanism of action of FB-102 making it impossible to ascertain whether the "proprietary molecule" that involves "antagonism of a pathway for autoimmune disease" has any advantages or is even likely to work. The company cites infrequent dosing as a potential benefit of the treatment. This is an extraordinarily poor reason to spend hundreds of millions to develop a treatment. Dosing is a very unimportant issue in diseases such as GvHD which can be fatal. Vitiligo and alopecia areata are diseases where patients have skin discolorations or baldness and patients are highly motivated to take their medicine.
Seeking Alpha Jul 07

Forte Biosciences large shareholders make demands for company's future

A pair of large shareholders of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) are making demands that could impact the company's future, including the suggestion that the company liquidate. In a Wednesday SEC filing, Brad Leonard, managing member of BML Capital Management, which has a 9.1% stake in common shares, wrote that "Forte shareholders would be best served by a complete liquidation as soon as possible." Forte (FBRX) and some shareholders have been at odds over the future of Forte's only asset, FB-102, which is in the preclinical stage for several indications, including alopecia and vitiligo, a conditions that affects skin pigmentation. Leonard noted that since a May announcement on development plans, there has not been a single insider purchase. On Tuesday, Jacob Ma-Weaver, managing member of Funicular Funds, said in a SEC filing that Forte's board had yet to make an "adequate assessment of the potential immediate value creation that could be achieved through a substantial buyback program, tender offer at a premium, or special dividend." Funicular has a 7.5% stake. Seeking Alpha's Quant Rating views Forte (FBRX) as a hold with the only high grade being for valuation.
분석 기사 Dec 23

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
분석 기사 Mar 13

Are Insiders Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Stock?

We often see insiders buying up shares in companies that perform well over the long term. The flip side of that is that...
분석 기사 Jan 19

Do Institutions Own Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

A look at the shareholders of Forte Biosciences, Inc. ( NASDAQ:FBRX ) can tell us which group is most powerful...
분석 기사 Nov 25

Who Has Been Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

We've lost count of how many times insiders have accumulated shares in a company that goes on to improve markedly. The...

CEO 보수 분석

Paul A. Wagner의 보수는 Forte Biosciences의 수익에 비해 어떻게 변했나요?
날짜총 보수급여회사 수익
Mar 31 2026n/an/a

-US$76m

Dec 31 2025US$7mUS$670k

-US$69m

Sep 30 2025n/an/a

-US$52m

Jun 30 2025n/an/a

-US$42m

Mar 31 2025n/an/a

-US$44m

Dec 31 2024US$2mUS$644k

-US$35m

Sep 30 2024n/an/a

-US$34m

Jun 30 2024n/an/a

-US$36m

Mar 31 2024n/an/a

-US$32m

Dec 31 2023US$1mUS$620k

-US$31m

Sep 30 2023n/an/a

-US$30m

Jun 30 2023n/an/a

-US$24m

Mar 31 2023n/an/a

-US$18m

Dec 31 2022US$1mUS$590k

-US$14m

Sep 30 2022n/an/a

-US$12m

Jun 30 2022n/an/a

-US$17m

Mar 31 2022n/an/a

-US$19m

Dec 31 2021US$5mUS$590k

-US$22m

Sep 30 2021n/an/a

-US$23m

Jun 30 2021n/an/a

-US$20m

Mar 31 2021n/an/a

-US$49m

Dec 31 2020US$777kUS$453k

-US$46m

Sep 30 2020n/an/a

-US$43m

Jun 30 2020n/an/a

-US$39m

Mar 31 2020n/an/a

-US$5m

Dec 31 2019US$525kUS$350k

-US$4m

보상 대 시장: Paul A.의 총 보수(USD7.36M)는 US 시장에서 비슷한 규모 기업의 평균(USD5.16M)보다 높습니다.

보상과 수익: Paul A.의 보상은 회사가 적자임에도 증가했습니다.


CEO

Paul A. Wagner (56 yo)

8.5yrs
재임 기간
US$7,358,587
보수

Dr. Paul A. Wagner, CFA, Ph.D. has been the Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy & Development and Chief Business Officer at CANbridge Life Sciences Ltd. since October 16, 2017. Dr. Wagner leads CAN...


리더십 팀

이름직위재임 기간보수지분
Paul A. Wagner
CEO, President & Chairman8.5yrsUS$7.36m0.35%
$ 6.6m
Antony Riley
Chief Financial Officer6.3yrsUS$2.72m0.17%
$ 3.3m
Barbara Finck
Senior Medical Clinician & Director2.3yrsUS$786.72k0%
$ 0
Christopher Roenfeldt
Chief Operating Officer4.2yrs데이터 없음데이터 없음
5.3yrs
평균 재임 기간
59yo
평균 나이

경험이 풍부한 관리: FBRX의 경영진은 노련하고 경험이 풍부합니다(평균 재임 5.3 년).


이사회 구성원

이름직위재임 기간보수지분
Paul A. Wagner
CEO, President & Chairman9.5yrsUS$7.36m0.35%
$ 6.6m
Barbara Finck
Senior Medical Clinician & Director4.3yrsUS$786.72k0%
$ 0
David Gryska
Independent Director3.5yrsUS$252.61k0.024%
$ 457.3k
Richard Vincent
Independent Director1.8yrsUS$271.74k0%
$ 0
Lawrence F. Eichenfield
Chair of Scientific Advisory Boardno dataUS$95.84k데이터 없음
Stephen Doberstein
Independent Director4.2yrsUS$250.02k0%
$ 0
Steven Kornfeld
Independent Director6.1yrsUS$288.15k0.016%
$ 304.9k
Shivpreet Kapoor
Independent Director1.8yrsUS$248.04k0%
$ 0
Scott Brun
Independent Director3.7yrsUS$255.02k0%
$ 0
3.9yrs
평균 재임 기간
62yo
평균 나이

경험이 풍부한 이사회: FBRX의 이사회경험이 있음으로 간주됩니다(평균 재임 3.9 년).


기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태

데이터최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간)
기업 분석2026/07/31 00:06
종가2026/07/31 00:00
수익2026/03/31
연간 수익2025/12/31

데이터 소스

당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.

패키지데이터기간미국 소스 예시 *
기업 재무제표10년
  • 손익계산서
  • 현금흐름표
  • 대차대조표
분석가 컨센서스 추정치+3년
  • 재무 예측
  • 분석가 목표주가
시장 가격30년
  • 주가
  • 배당, 분할 및 기타 조치
지분 구조10년
  • 주요 주주
  • 내부자 거래
경영진10년
  • 리더십 팀
  • 이사회
주요 개발10년
  • 회사 공시

* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.

별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.

분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크

이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델의 세부 정보는 당사의 GitHub 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 사용 방법에 대한 가이드YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공하고 있습니다.

Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.

산업 및 섹터 지표

산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.

분석가 소스

Forte Biosciences, Inc.는 10명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 3명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.

분석가기관
Etzer DaroutBarclays
Kalpit PatelB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Kumaraguru RajaBrookline Capital Markets