This company has been acquired
The company may no longer be operating, as it has been acquired. Find out why through their latest events.
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (IEA) 주식 개요
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as a diversified infrastructure construction company in the United States. 자세히 보기
IEA Community Fair Values
Create NarrativeSee what others think this stock is worth. Follow their fair value or set your own to get alerts.
NEW489,440 members
Join community and earn perks
Gain real feedbackFrom our editorial team, personally. Not silence.
Grow your followingReal investors. The kind who actually invest, not scroll past.
Unlock free accessFree premium subscription for consistent and quality authors.
BL
IN
RO
AG
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc. 경쟁사
가격 이력 및 성과
| 과거 주가 | |
|---|---|
| 현재 주가 | US$13.72 |
| 52주 최고가 | US$14.60 |
| 52주 최저가 | US$6.38 |
| 베타 | 1.73 |
| 1개월 변동 | -3.79% |
| 3개월 변동 | 54.33% |
| 1년 변동 | 31.29% |
| 3년 변동 | 408.15% |
| 5년 변동 | n/a |
| IPO 이후 변동 | 61.41% |
최근 뉴스 및 업데이트
Seeking Alpha • Jul 26
MasTec Acquires IEA: Turnaround Possible, But Not Right Now
Both MasTec and IEA are diversified engineering, procurement, and construction companies. However, IEA significantly increases MasTec’s exposure to renewable energy projects. Thanks to IEA, MasTec will gain some issues with profitability, but as I have discussed before, I believe IEA is set for a turnaround. Will it be worth holding on to MTZ shares? Introduction to Renewed Thesis I am a shareholder of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (IEA), and have written an article discussing how current profit weakness is an opportunity for value expansion upon improvement. Well, it seems that I am not the only one looking for a turnaround play, as another EPC MasTec (MTZ) has acquired IEA. The current 30% premium, or 50% above my prior article, is certainly a strong return, and came far sooner than expected. However, the share price has been weak for at least a year and a half, as the current buyout price is only a mild premium over my first coverage of IEA. I am thankful that I have recently added more shares on the weakness, an important way to trade cyclical companies. The questions now are: to sell IEA prior to the completion of the acquisition, or to hold on to the coming MasTec shares. It is an interesting thought experiment, and I see a few pros and cons to both sides of the coin. Unfortunately, MasTec does not have a strong balance sheet, and this acquisition is both draining all cash on hand, and is dilutive ($14 total share price, $10.50 funded in cash and $3.50 in shares/dilution). At the same time, we remain in a weak cycle for EPCs, especially as the effects of the infrastructure bill remain unseen. If investor sentiment changes over the next few quarters thanks to out-performance, MasTec’s similarly low valuation allows for shares to gain at a rapid clip. MasTec Acquisition Presentation MasTec’s new pro forma outlook has been presented, shown in the image below, and I believe that the new company will gain necessary diversification. MTZ has traditionally relied on communications and power delivery revenues, while IEA has seen far more growth from renewable energy projects. Now, the company will have more growth segments to rely on even if governmental negligence prevents full stimulus (while one bill has been passed, effects have yet to be seen but renewable projects may be at the fore). I believe that stimulus will be necessary to allow for a bullish outlook on MasTec due to financial weakness. MasTec The acquisition exacerbates two major issues: debt and profitability. IEA is known as having profitability issues, even as revenue growth has averaged over 50% per year for multiple years. Meanwhile, MasTec has tried hard to maintain positive net income, but this has come with debt and at the expense of growth. It is difficult to expect that current profitability will be maintained, and so, investors may sell-off as the company attempts to consolidate the joint businesses. While this may lead to an opportunity later on, the shares may be weak in the intermediate term. As you can see in the two charts below, management will have a lot of work to do to find synergies and increase profit margins. Perhaps economies of scale, internal supplier/client relationships, and other catalysts will allow for improvement. Unfortunately, more stimulus/favorable contracts will be necessary. Koyfin Koyfin Moving to balance sheet issues, we can see that MasTec is already significantly levered. Now, IEA will be adding a further $400 million in debt to the combined company, a total over $2.5 billion. The deal will also be dilutive, so look for MasTec’s share count to increase. Lastly, IEA’s current losses are greater than MTZ’s current FCF, so it is unknown whether the balance sheet will be improved moving forward. This uncertainty further lowers investor sentiment, and in turn, share price. This is why the MTZ is already down 6% after the announcement, and selling may continue. Koyfin Koyfin One of the few positives I can see is the cheap acquisition price, and the continued opportunity for the value to rise. While reliant on both companies seeing increases in profitability, the opportunity arises thanks to fiscal stimulus. Further, IEA has access to the important clean energy industry that remains in a secular growth cycle. As MasTec’s valuation reaches all-time lows, one should expect this poor cycle to end, and a positive one to begin. While leverage will continue to hamper the EV/EBITDA value, the P/S indicates that any changes in profitability has the ability to quickly bring the value above 1.0x. This would account for over 60% return, and may occur within a few years based on current guidance. However, in the short-term, I would wait for the valuation to continue falling, and prices below 0.5x P/S are historically better times to buy MTZ.Seeking Alpha • Jun 28
Long IEA, Short REI: Renewable Energy Vs. Fossil Fuels, A Showdown
The most important, and economically viable, pair trade in the market is: short fossil fuels - long renewables. Yes, yes, please hear me out. Before you click away, I will address dilemmas and hindrances to my thesis, including governmental inefficiency, wasteful spending, and risky investment strategies. For this reason, I provide multiple hedges on both sides of the aisle in order to perform proper risk management. I do not look to persuade you into choosing one or the other, I am merely sharing my own ideology on the matter.Recent updates
주주 수익률
| IEA | US Construction | US 시장 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7D | 1.3% | -0.3% | 0.6% |
| 1Y | 31.3% | 70.6% | 19.5% |
수익률 대 산업: IEA은 지난 1년 동안 70.6%의 수익을 기록한 US Construction 산업보다 더 좋은 성과를 냈습니다.
수익률 대 시장: IEA은 지난 1년 동안 19.5%를 기록한 US 시장보다 더 좋은 성과를 냈습니다.
주가 변동성
| IEA volatility | |
|---|---|
| IEA Average Weekly Movement | 9.4% |
| Construction Industry Average Movement | 8.9% |
| Market Average Movement | 7.3% |
| 10% most volatile stocks in US Market | 16.7% |
| 10% least volatile stocks in US Market | 3.2% |
안정적인 주가: IEA의 주가는 지난 3개월 동안 US 시장보다 변동성이 컸습니다.
시간에 따른 변동성: IEA의 주간 변동성(9%)은 지난 1년 동안 안정적이었습니다.
회사 소개
| 설립 | 직원 수 | CEO | 웹사이트 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1947 | 3,718 | JP Roehm | www.iea.net |
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc. 기초 지표 요약
| IEA 기초 통계 | |
|---|---|
| 시가총액 | US$667.00m |
| 순이익 (TTM) | -US$78.35m |
| 매출 (TTM) | US$2.28b |
0.3x
주가매출비율(P/S)-8.5x
주가수익비율(P/E)IEA는 고평가되어 있습니까?
공정 가치 및 평가 분석 보기순이익 및 매출
| IEA 손익계산서 (TTM) | |
|---|---|
| 매출 | US$2.28b |
| 매출원가 | US$2.08b |
| 총이익 | US$201.48m |
| 기타 비용 | US$279.83m |
| 순이익 | -US$78.35m |
최근 보고된 실적
Jun 30, 2022
다음 실적 발표일
해당 없음
| 주당순이익(EPS) | -1.61 |
| 총이익률 | 8.83% |
| 순이익률 | -3.43% |
| 부채/자본 비율 | 1,371.0% |
IEA의 장기 실적은 어땠습니까?
과거 실적 및 비교 보기기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태
| 데이터 | 최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간) |
|---|---|
| 기업 분석 | 2022/10/07 20:41 |
| 종가 | 2022/10/06 00:00 |
| 수익 | 2022/06/30 |
| 연간 수익 | 2021/12/31 |
데이터 소스
당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.
| 패키지 | 데이터 | 기간 | 미국 소스 예시 * |
|---|---|---|---|
| 기업 재무제표 | 10년 |
| |
| 분석가 컨센서스 추정치 | +3년 |
|
|
| 시장 가격 | 30년 |
| |
| 지분 구조 | 10년 |
| |
| 경영진 | 10년 |
| |
| 주요 개발 | 10년 |
|
* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.
별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.
분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크
이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델에 대한 세부 정보는 당사의 Github 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있으며, 보고서 활용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공하고 있습니다.
Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.
산업 및 섹터 지표
산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.
분석가 소스
Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, Inc.는 5명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 2명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.
| 분석가 | 기관 |
|---|---|
| Brent Thielman | D.A. Davidson & Co. |
| Shahriar Pourreza | Guggenheim Securities, LLC |
| Paul Penney | Northland Capital Markets |