View Financial HealthThis company listing is no longer activeThis company may still be operating, however this listing is no longer active. Find out why through their latest events.See Latest EventsCaNickel Mining 배당 및 자사주 매입배당 기준 점검 0/6CaNickel Mining 배당금을 지급한 기록이 없습니다.핵심 정보n/a배당 수익률n/a자사주 매입 수익률총 주주 수익률n/a미래 배당 수익률n/a배당 성장률n/a다음 배당 지급일n/a배당락일n/a주당 배당금n/a배당 성향n/a최근 배당 및 자사주 매입 업데이트업데이트 없음모든 업데이트 보기Recent updates공시 • Jun 13CaNickel Mining Limited Announces Director ResignationsCaNickel Mining Limited at its annual meeting of shareholders held on June 11, 2025, Myles Gao, Lorne Waldman, Kevin Zhu and Weiliang Wang did not stand for renomination to the Board.공시 • May 08+ 1 more updateCanickel Mining Limited Appoints Shirley Anthony as Corporate SecretaryCaNickel Mining Limited announced that Shirley Anthony, Chief Executive Officer of CaNickel, will assume the additional responsibilities of Corporate Secretary, effective immediately.Board Change • Sep 01Insufficient new directorsNo new directors have joined the board in the last 3 years. The company's board is composed of: No new directors. 2 experienced directors. 7 highly experienced directors. Independent Director Lorne Waldman was the last director to join the board, commencing their role in 2021. The following issues are considered to be risks according to the Simply Wall St Risk Model: Insufficient board refreshment.New Risk • May 30New major risk - Revenue and earnings growthEarnings have declined by 2.3% per year over the past 5 years. This is considered a major risk. Ultimately, shareholders want to see a good return on their investment and that generally comes from sharing in the company's profits. If profits are declining over an extended period, then in most cases the share price will decline over time unless the company can turn around its fortunes. A trend of falling earnings can be very difficult to turn around. If the company is well already established it may also be a sign the company has matured and is in decline. In addition, if the company pays dividends it will also likely need to reduce or cut them, striking a dual blow to total shareholder returns. Currently, the following risks have been identified for the company: Major Risks Less than 1 year of cash runway based on free cash flow trend (-CA$1.2m free cash flow). Share price has been highly volatile over the past 3 months (71% average daily change). Negative equity (-CA$112m). Earnings have declined by 2.3% per year over the past 5 years. Revenue is less than US$1m (CA$11k revenue, or US$8.2k). Market cap is less than US$10m (€1.01m market cap, or US$1.10m).공시 • Nov 13CaNickel Mining Limited Announces Chief Executive Officer ChangesCaNickel Mining Limited announced that it has promoted Shirley Anthony from VP Corporate Development to the position of Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately. Ms. Anthony fills in the role from Kevin Zhu, who has resigned to pursue other opportunities. Mr. Zhu will continue to serve as a director of the Company. Ms. Anthony has over 15 years of corporate communications, investor relations, strategic marketing and corporate development experience at numerous publicly traded North American resource companies ranging from early-stage exploration to production. Most recently, she held the role of VP Investor Relations and Communications with Cassiar Gold Corp. Prior to that, she held roles as Director, Corporate Communications with Maple Gold Mines; VP, Corporate Communications for International Tower Hill Mines; Manager, Corporate Communications for Corvus Gold; and Corporate Communications Manager for Silvercorp Metals. Ms. Anthony holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Interdisciplinary Studies from the University of British Columbia and is based in Vancouver, B.C.공시 • Jun 13CaNickel Mining Limited, Annual General Meeting, Aug 17, 2023CaNickel Mining Limited, Annual General Meeting, Aug 17, 2023.공시 • Jan 17CaNickel Mining Ltd. Releases Summary of Results of Current Independent Preliminary Economic Assessment and Mineral Resource Estimate on Its Bucko Lake MineCaNickel Mining Ltd. released a summary of the results of a current independent Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) and Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) on the Company's Bucko Lake Mine (the Project) located 110 km southwest of Thompson, Manitoba near the Town of Wabowden. The PEA outlines a mine life of 13 years with average annual production of 7.8 million pounds of nickel at average cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (AISC) per pound of nickel of USD 4.91 and USD 6.48, respectively. Preparation of PEA: The PEA was prepared by independent firm P&E Mining Consultants Inc. of Brampton, Ontario, with geotechnical assistance from Knight Piésold Ltd. and backfill assistance by Paterson & Cooke Canada Inc. The PEA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and has an effective date of January 13, 2023. For the PEA base case, a nickel price of USD 9.84/lb was used. Updated Mineral Resource Estimate: The updated MRE incorporates results from a total of 428 drill holes drilled from 1962 to 2013, of which 360 drill holes intersected the mineralization wireframes used for the MRE. Additionally, recent metal prices were incorporated into the estimate for the PEA. The MRE, with an effective date of January 13, 2023. Mineralization domain boundaries were determined from grade boundary interpretation constrained by lithological and structural controls determined from visual inspection of drill hole cross-sections and level plans. The domain outlines were influenced by the selection of mineralized material above 0.70% Ni that demonstrated a lithological and structural zonal continuity along strike and down dip and that had a reasonable prospect of economic extraction. The minimum constrained down-hole sample length for the wireframes was 2.0 m. In some cases, mineralization below 0.70% Ni was included for the purpose of maintaining zonal continuity and minimum mining width. On each cross-section, polyline interpretations were digitized from drill hole to drill hole, however, were not extended more than 25 m into untested territory. The interpreted polylines from each cross-section were wireframed into 3-Dimensional solids. The resulting solids (domains) were used for statistical analysis, grade interpolation, rock coding and Mineral Resource reporting purposes. Four mineralization domains were constructed for consideration for potential economic underground mining of the Mineral Resource Estimate. In order to regularize the assay sampling intervals for grade interpolation, a 1.5 m compositing length was selected for the drill hole intervals that fell within the constraints of the above-mentioned Mineral Resource wireframe domains. Grade capping was investigated and applied to the 1.5 m composite values in the database within the constraining domain to ensure that the possible influence of erratic high-grade values did not bias the database. A variography analysis was undertaken as a guide to determining a grade interpolation search strategy. The Ni and Cu grade blocks in the model were interpolated with the Inverse Distance Squared method. The model block size was 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m. The Nearest Neighbour interpolation method was utilized for validation. Additional mineralization at the Bucko Lake property not captured in the PEA include four known satellite deposits located 4 to 30 km distance from the main deposit. These include the Bowden Lake, M11A, Halfway Lake and Apex prospects. All four deposits have historical mineral resources which the Company will update into compliant NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimates in the coming months. These satellite deposits represent an opportunity for extending the operational life of the Project, which will be evaluated in future studies. Underground Mine Development: Despite underground development challenges associated with geotechnical stability experienced during previous operations at the Bucko Lake Mine from 2009 to 2012, there are no significant technical issues to preclude successful mining and processing of the nickel-copper mineralization. Optimization of mining methods and Life of Mine planning with cemented paste backfill hold the key to a successful mine restart and the PEA has adopted the following mine development strategy to overcome previously known issues: Rehabilitate and re-use existing development where possible while avoiding stopes in historical production areas: Refit and re-use the existing shaft for broken rock conveyance; Rehabilitate and re-use the existing ramp for trackless equipment access; Convert the existing 1,000 ft (305 m) Level exploration drift into new primary access on hanging wall (HW) side of the deposit; Change access orientation to the HW from the footwall (FW) to improve geotechnical stability of the parallel wireframed domains. Improve the ventilation system by relocating ventilation raises to the HW side of the deposit using raise-bores from the 1,000 ft Level to surface. Postpone capital development while mining previously accessed areas. FW drifts will allow improved grade selection, bypassing low-grade areas and allowing improvement of the grade profile by targeting more high-grade areas earlier. Alimak ventilation raises will be attached to FW drifts to facilitate bypassing of levels in a mining block versus using drop raises, allowing further postponement of lateral development. Areas of development to be situated away from weaker ultramafic contact areas. Development will be done either outside the ultramafic unit or fully inside the unit with improved ground support versus previous efforts at the mine. Intersections with the ultramafic unit, while unavoidable, will be minimized. Mine design and planning were accomplished with the assistance of geomechanical input from Knight Piésold Ltd. based on the review of the historical mine performance, experience at similar operating mines, and empirical methods. Knight Piésold provided numerous recommendations on the PEA underground mine plan. Paterson & Cooke Canada Inc. reviewed the paste backfill system that was previously installed at the Bucko Lake Mine. The system was installed just prior to mine suspension in 2012 and therefore never commissioned. Recommendations were provided on rehabilitating equipment, completing the paste plant installation and future test work.Reported Earnings • May 28First quarter 2022 earnings released: CA$0.046 loss per share (vs CA$0.042 loss in 1Q 2021)First quarter 2022 results: CA$0.046 loss per share (down from CA$0.042 loss in 1Q 2021). Net loss: CA$1.74m (loss widened 11% from 1Q 2021). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 55% per year but the company’s share price has only increased by 16% per year, which means it is significantly lagging earnings growth.Reported Earnings • Apr 27Full year 2021 earnings released: EPS: CA$0.33 (vs CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020)Full year 2021 results: EPS: CA$0.33 (up from CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020). Net income: CA$12.5m (up CA$23.0m from FY 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 48% per year whereas the company’s share price has increased by 45% per year.Reported Earnings • Apr 24Full year 2021 earnings released: EPS: CA$0.33 (vs CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020)Full year 2021 results: EPS: CA$0.33 (up from CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020). Net income: CA$12.5m (up CA$23.0m from FY 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 48% per year but the company’s share price has only increased by 36% per year, which means it is significantly lagging earnings growth.Reported Earnings • Aug 22Second quarter 2021 earnings released: CA$0.031 loss per share (vs CA$0.005 profit in 2Q 2020)Second quarter 2021 results: Net loss: CA$1.17m (down CA$1.36m from profit in 2Q 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 36% per year but the company’s share price has only increased by 4% per year, which means it is significantly lagging earnings growth.Reported Earnings • May 06First quarter 2021 earnings released: CA$0.042 loss per share (vs CA$0.27 loss in 1Q 2020)The company reported a solid first quarter result with reduced losses, improved revenues and improved control over expenses. First quarter 2021 results: Revenue: CA$320.0k (up 33% from 1Q 2020). Net loss: CA$1.56m (loss narrowed 85% from 1Q 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 30% per year and the company’s share price has also increased by 30% per year.지급의 안정성과 성장배당 데이터 가져오는 중안정적인 배당: 과거에 CMID 의 주당 배당금이 안정적이었는지 판단하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.배당금 증가: CMID 의 배당금 지급이 증가했는지 판단하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.배당 수익률 vs 시장CaNickel Mining 배당 수익률 vs 시장CMID의 배당 수익률은 시장과 어떻게 비교되나요?구분배당 수익률회사 (CMID)n/a시장 하위 25% (DE)1.5%시장 상위 25% (DE)4.5%업계 평균 (Metals and Mining)1.4%분석가 예측 (CMID) (최대 3년)n/a주목할만한 배당금: 회사가 최근 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 하위 25%의 배당금 지급자에 대해 CMID 의 배당 수익률을 평가할 수 없습니다.고배당: 회사가 최근 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 배당금 지급자의 상위 25%에 대해 CMID 의 배당 수익률을 평가할 수 없습니다.주주 대상 이익 배당수익 보장: 배당금 지급이 수익으로 충당되는지 확인하기 위해 CMID 의 지급 비율을 계산하기에는 데이터가 부족합니다.주주 현금 배당현금 흐름 범위: CMID 에서 지급을 보고하지 않았기 때문에 배당 지속 가능성을 계산할 수 없습니다.높은 배당을 제공하는 우량 기업 찾기7D1Y7D1Y7D1YDE 시장에서 배당이 강한 기업.View Management기업 분석 및 재무 데이터 상태데이터최종 업데이트 (UTC 시간)기업 분석2025/07/10 02:49종가2025/06/26 00:00수익2025/03/31연간 수익2024/12/31데이터 소스당사의 기업 분석에 사용되는 데이터는 S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC에서 제공됩니다. 아래 데이터는 이 보고서를 생성하기 위해 분석 모델에서 사용됩니다. 데이터는 정규화되므로 소스가 제공된 후 지연이 발생할 수 있습니다.패키지데이터기간미국 소스 예시 *기업 재무제표10년손익계산서현금흐름표대차대조표SEC 양식 10-KSEC 양식 10-Q분석가 컨센서스 추정치+3년재무 예측분석가 목표주가분석가 리서치 보고서Blue Matrix시장 가격30년주가배당, 분할 및 기타 조치ICE 시장 데이터SEC 양식 S-1지분 구조10년주요 주주내부자 거래SEC 양식 4SEC 양식 13D경영진10년리더십 팀이사회SEC 양식 10-KSEC 양식 DEF 14A주요 개발10년회사 공시SEC 양식 8-K* 미국 증권에 대한 예시이며, 비(非)미국 증권에는 해당 국가의 규제 서식 및 자료원을 사용합니다.별도로 명시되지 않는 한 모든 재무 데이터는 연간 기간을 기준으로 하지만 분기별로 업데이트됩니다. 이를 TTM(최근 12개월) 또는 LTM(지난 12개월) 데이터라고 합니다. 자세히 알아보기.분석 모델 및 스노우플레이크이 보고서를 생성하는 데 사용된 분석 모델에 대한 자세한 내용은 당사의 Github 페이지에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 또한 보고서 활용 방법에 대한 가이드와 YouTube 튜토리얼도 제공합니다.Simply Wall St 분석 모델을 설계하고 구축한 세계적 수준의 팀에 대해 알아보세요.산업 및 섹터 지표산업 및 섹터 지표는 Simply Wall St가 6시간마다 계산하며, 프로세스에 대한 자세한 내용은 Github에서 확인할 수 있습니다.분석가 소스CaNickel Mining Limited는 2명의 분석가가 다루고 있습니다. 이 중 0명의 분석가가 우리 보고서에 입력 데이터로 사용되는 매출 또는 수익 추정치를 제출했습니다. 분석가의 제출 자료는 하루 종일 업데이트됩니다.분석가기관Pierre VaillancourtMacquarie ResearchBarry AllanResearch Capital Corporation
공시 • Jun 13CaNickel Mining Limited Announces Director ResignationsCaNickel Mining Limited at its annual meeting of shareholders held on June 11, 2025, Myles Gao, Lorne Waldman, Kevin Zhu and Weiliang Wang did not stand for renomination to the Board.
공시 • May 08+ 1 more updateCanickel Mining Limited Appoints Shirley Anthony as Corporate SecretaryCaNickel Mining Limited announced that Shirley Anthony, Chief Executive Officer of CaNickel, will assume the additional responsibilities of Corporate Secretary, effective immediately.
Board Change • Sep 01Insufficient new directorsNo new directors have joined the board in the last 3 years. The company's board is composed of: No new directors. 2 experienced directors. 7 highly experienced directors. Independent Director Lorne Waldman was the last director to join the board, commencing their role in 2021. The following issues are considered to be risks according to the Simply Wall St Risk Model: Insufficient board refreshment.
New Risk • May 30New major risk - Revenue and earnings growthEarnings have declined by 2.3% per year over the past 5 years. This is considered a major risk. Ultimately, shareholders want to see a good return on their investment and that generally comes from sharing in the company's profits. If profits are declining over an extended period, then in most cases the share price will decline over time unless the company can turn around its fortunes. A trend of falling earnings can be very difficult to turn around. If the company is well already established it may also be a sign the company has matured and is in decline. In addition, if the company pays dividends it will also likely need to reduce or cut them, striking a dual blow to total shareholder returns. Currently, the following risks have been identified for the company: Major Risks Less than 1 year of cash runway based on free cash flow trend (-CA$1.2m free cash flow). Share price has been highly volatile over the past 3 months (71% average daily change). Negative equity (-CA$112m). Earnings have declined by 2.3% per year over the past 5 years. Revenue is less than US$1m (CA$11k revenue, or US$8.2k). Market cap is less than US$10m (€1.01m market cap, or US$1.10m).
공시 • Nov 13CaNickel Mining Limited Announces Chief Executive Officer ChangesCaNickel Mining Limited announced that it has promoted Shirley Anthony from VP Corporate Development to the position of Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately. Ms. Anthony fills in the role from Kevin Zhu, who has resigned to pursue other opportunities. Mr. Zhu will continue to serve as a director of the Company. Ms. Anthony has over 15 years of corporate communications, investor relations, strategic marketing and corporate development experience at numerous publicly traded North American resource companies ranging from early-stage exploration to production. Most recently, she held the role of VP Investor Relations and Communications with Cassiar Gold Corp. Prior to that, she held roles as Director, Corporate Communications with Maple Gold Mines; VP, Corporate Communications for International Tower Hill Mines; Manager, Corporate Communications for Corvus Gold; and Corporate Communications Manager for Silvercorp Metals. Ms. Anthony holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Interdisciplinary Studies from the University of British Columbia and is based in Vancouver, B.C.
공시 • Jun 13CaNickel Mining Limited, Annual General Meeting, Aug 17, 2023CaNickel Mining Limited, Annual General Meeting, Aug 17, 2023.
공시 • Jan 17CaNickel Mining Ltd. Releases Summary of Results of Current Independent Preliminary Economic Assessment and Mineral Resource Estimate on Its Bucko Lake MineCaNickel Mining Ltd. released a summary of the results of a current independent Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA) and Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) on the Company's Bucko Lake Mine (the Project) located 110 km southwest of Thompson, Manitoba near the Town of Wabowden. The PEA outlines a mine life of 13 years with average annual production of 7.8 million pounds of nickel at average cash costs and all-in sustaining costs (AISC) per pound of nickel of USD 4.91 and USD 6.48, respectively. Preparation of PEA: The PEA was prepared by independent firm P&E Mining Consultants Inc. of Brampton, Ontario, with geotechnical assistance from Knight Piésold Ltd. and backfill assistance by Paterson & Cooke Canada Inc. The PEA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, and has an effective date of January 13, 2023. For the PEA base case, a nickel price of USD 9.84/lb was used. Updated Mineral Resource Estimate: The updated MRE incorporates results from a total of 428 drill holes drilled from 1962 to 2013, of which 360 drill holes intersected the mineralization wireframes used for the MRE. Additionally, recent metal prices were incorporated into the estimate for the PEA. The MRE, with an effective date of January 13, 2023. Mineralization domain boundaries were determined from grade boundary interpretation constrained by lithological and structural controls determined from visual inspection of drill hole cross-sections and level plans. The domain outlines were influenced by the selection of mineralized material above 0.70% Ni that demonstrated a lithological and structural zonal continuity along strike and down dip and that had a reasonable prospect of economic extraction. The minimum constrained down-hole sample length for the wireframes was 2.0 m. In some cases, mineralization below 0.70% Ni was included for the purpose of maintaining zonal continuity and minimum mining width. On each cross-section, polyline interpretations were digitized from drill hole to drill hole, however, were not extended more than 25 m into untested territory. The interpreted polylines from each cross-section were wireframed into 3-Dimensional solids. The resulting solids (domains) were used for statistical analysis, grade interpolation, rock coding and Mineral Resource reporting purposes. Four mineralization domains were constructed for consideration for potential economic underground mining of the Mineral Resource Estimate. In order to regularize the assay sampling intervals for grade interpolation, a 1.5 m compositing length was selected for the drill hole intervals that fell within the constraints of the above-mentioned Mineral Resource wireframe domains. Grade capping was investigated and applied to the 1.5 m composite values in the database within the constraining domain to ensure that the possible influence of erratic high-grade values did not bias the database. A variography analysis was undertaken as a guide to determining a grade interpolation search strategy. The Ni and Cu grade blocks in the model were interpolated with the Inverse Distance Squared method. The model block size was 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m. The Nearest Neighbour interpolation method was utilized for validation. Additional mineralization at the Bucko Lake property not captured in the PEA include four known satellite deposits located 4 to 30 km distance from the main deposit. These include the Bowden Lake, M11A, Halfway Lake and Apex prospects. All four deposits have historical mineral resources which the Company will update into compliant NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimates in the coming months. These satellite deposits represent an opportunity for extending the operational life of the Project, which will be evaluated in future studies. Underground Mine Development: Despite underground development challenges associated with geotechnical stability experienced during previous operations at the Bucko Lake Mine from 2009 to 2012, there are no significant technical issues to preclude successful mining and processing of the nickel-copper mineralization. Optimization of mining methods and Life of Mine planning with cemented paste backfill hold the key to a successful mine restart and the PEA has adopted the following mine development strategy to overcome previously known issues: Rehabilitate and re-use existing development where possible while avoiding stopes in historical production areas: Refit and re-use the existing shaft for broken rock conveyance; Rehabilitate and re-use the existing ramp for trackless equipment access; Convert the existing 1,000 ft (305 m) Level exploration drift into new primary access on hanging wall (HW) side of the deposit; Change access orientation to the HW from the footwall (FW) to improve geotechnical stability of the parallel wireframed domains. Improve the ventilation system by relocating ventilation raises to the HW side of the deposit using raise-bores from the 1,000 ft Level to surface. Postpone capital development while mining previously accessed areas. FW drifts will allow improved grade selection, bypassing low-grade areas and allowing improvement of the grade profile by targeting more high-grade areas earlier. Alimak ventilation raises will be attached to FW drifts to facilitate bypassing of levels in a mining block versus using drop raises, allowing further postponement of lateral development. Areas of development to be situated away from weaker ultramafic contact areas. Development will be done either outside the ultramafic unit or fully inside the unit with improved ground support versus previous efforts at the mine. Intersections with the ultramafic unit, while unavoidable, will be minimized. Mine design and planning were accomplished with the assistance of geomechanical input from Knight Piésold Ltd. based on the review of the historical mine performance, experience at similar operating mines, and empirical methods. Knight Piésold provided numerous recommendations on the PEA underground mine plan. Paterson & Cooke Canada Inc. reviewed the paste backfill system that was previously installed at the Bucko Lake Mine. The system was installed just prior to mine suspension in 2012 and therefore never commissioned. Recommendations were provided on rehabilitating equipment, completing the paste plant installation and future test work.
Reported Earnings • May 28First quarter 2022 earnings released: CA$0.046 loss per share (vs CA$0.042 loss in 1Q 2021)First quarter 2022 results: CA$0.046 loss per share (down from CA$0.042 loss in 1Q 2021). Net loss: CA$1.74m (loss widened 11% from 1Q 2021). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 55% per year but the company’s share price has only increased by 16% per year, which means it is significantly lagging earnings growth.
Reported Earnings • Apr 27Full year 2021 earnings released: EPS: CA$0.33 (vs CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020)Full year 2021 results: EPS: CA$0.33 (up from CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020). Net income: CA$12.5m (up CA$23.0m from FY 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 48% per year whereas the company’s share price has increased by 45% per year.
Reported Earnings • Apr 24Full year 2021 earnings released: EPS: CA$0.33 (vs CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020)Full year 2021 results: EPS: CA$0.33 (up from CA$0.28 loss in FY 2020). Net income: CA$12.5m (up CA$23.0m from FY 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 48% per year but the company’s share price has only increased by 36% per year, which means it is significantly lagging earnings growth.
Reported Earnings • Aug 22Second quarter 2021 earnings released: CA$0.031 loss per share (vs CA$0.005 profit in 2Q 2020)Second quarter 2021 results: Net loss: CA$1.17m (down CA$1.36m from profit in 2Q 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 36% per year but the company’s share price has only increased by 4% per year, which means it is significantly lagging earnings growth.
Reported Earnings • May 06First quarter 2021 earnings released: CA$0.042 loss per share (vs CA$0.27 loss in 1Q 2020)The company reported a solid first quarter result with reduced losses, improved revenues and improved control over expenses. First quarter 2021 results: Revenue: CA$320.0k (up 33% from 1Q 2020). Net loss: CA$1.56m (loss narrowed 85% from 1Q 2020). Over the last 3 years on average, earnings per share has increased by 30% per year and the company’s share price has also increased by 30% per year.