BowFlex Inc.

OTCPK:BFXX.Q 株式レポート

時価総額:US$3.6k

This company is no longer active

The company may no longer be operating, as it may be out of business. Find out why through their latest events.

BowFlex バランスシートの健全性

財務の健全性 基準チェック /26

BowFlexの総株主資本は$-23.8M 、総負債は$16.0Mで、負債比率は-67.2%となります。総資産と総負債はそれぞれ$86.3Mと$110.1Mです。

主要情報

-67.18%

負債資本比率

US$16.00m

負債

インタレスト・カバレッジ・レシオn/a
現金US$8.66m
エクイティ-US$23.81m
負債合計US$110.12m
総資産US$86.31m

財務の健全性に関する最新情報

Recent updates

分析記事 Oct 02

Nautilus (NYSE:NLS) Has Debt But No Earnings; Should You Worry?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility...
分析記事 Aug 10

Should You Investigate Nautilus, Inc. (NYSE:NLS) At US$1.00?

Nautilus, Inc. ( NYSE:NLS ), might not be a large cap stock, but it received a lot of attention from a substantial...
Seeking Alpha May 29

Nautilus: Cheap Price Does Not Mean Undervalued

Summary Nautilus fell from its high of $30 to $1.3. Demand is weakening, and Nautilus can’t do anything about it. The best play may be selling its children's brands. The price is near liquidation, which I believe is at around $0.85. Read the full article on Seeking Alpha
分析記事 Feb 14

What You Need To Know About The Nautilus, Inc. (NYSE:NLS) Analyst Downgrade Today

The latest analyst coverage could presage a bad day for Nautilus, Inc. ( NYSE:NLS ), with the analysts making...
分析記事 Feb 12

Nautilus (NYSE:NLS) Has Debt But No Earnings; Should You Worry?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility...
Seeking Alpha Feb 09

Nautilus GAAP EPS of -$0.35 misses by $0.07, revenue of $98.08M misses by $5.42M

Nautilus press release (NYSE:NLS): Q3 GAAP EPS of -$0.35 misses by $0.07. Revenue of $98.08M (-33.4% Y/Y) misses by $5.42M. JRNY Total Members Reaches Approximately 450k with 88% Growth vs Q3 Fiscal 2022 Full Year 2023 The Company expects full year revenue of about $270 million compared to the previous range of $315 million to $365 million. The decline in revenue is primarily due to lower expectations in the Retail segment. The Company now expects full year Adjusted EBITDA1 loss (excluding restructuring costs) to be approximately $50 million compared to the prior range of Adjusted EBITDA(1) loss of between $30 million and $40 million. The Company is targeting JRNY Members to be approximately 500,000 at March 31, 2023.
Seeking Alpha Oct 01

Nautilus: Buy For The Potential Buyout? Meh

Summary Nautilus recently announced that it was exploring strategic alternatives, including a potential sale of the entire company. As the company continues to lose ground and move into a deeper unhealthy financial position, the risks associated with an acquisition falling through are greater than M&A arbitrage, I believe. As a result, even if a purely speculative position may be okay, I don't believe the risk-reward profile fits a traditional M&A arbitrage and will not be holding a position. Earlier this month, Nautilus (NLS) announced that its board was discussing the potential sale of the company as part of them exploring strategic alternatives. While this way forward makes sense to me given the OPC (one product company) nature of the company, the real question is at what premium to their current share price, if at all, is this potential transaction going to take place? Let's explore the company and try to get a sense of that. Declining Company Fundamentals While the company's products are sound, they lack the hype factor of companies like Peloton (PTON), which caused them some headaches when trying to market the products to gyms and for personal use. Unsurprisingly, the company saw a surge in sales during the pandemic as a good chunk of the world remained locked down in one way or another and many sought out alternatives to gyms, which were mostly closed. The company's revenues surged from $309 million in 2019 to almost $665 million in 2021, more than doubling over a period of just 2 years. Since then, however, the company's sales have been declining as they both are unable to find that comparative growth, like most other companies in the field, as well as losing ground in services, or the 'interactive' part of their products to companies like Peloton and other private companies. In 2022, the company reported a decline in sales to just shy of $590 million and their current projections for the upcoming fiscal year call for a decline of almost 33% to $397 million and then a 9% increase in the following year to $434 million. Margins Not Too Hot Either With great pandemic-sales power, comes great operational expenses responsibilities. And with that higher sales volume came higher operational expenses, which rose from just over $100 million annually to over $160 million annually. This has, along with the slightly higher cost of revenues, caused the company to report a loss for fiscal 2022, and that loss is expected to deepen dramatically in the coming fiscal year. After reporting EPS of $2.67 in the year with record revenues, the company reported a loss of $(0.72) in the last fiscal year and is expected to report a much deeper loss this coming year. Based on the same analyst projections, the company is expected to report an EPS loss of $(2.56) for the coming fiscal year, followed by a 75% rise the following year, to a loss of $(0.68). But it's not like the company has some cash reserves to fall back on to maintain operational efficiency or fund operations through an acquisition. Low Cash, High Debt The company currently has one of its lowest ever cash positions at just $7.3 million in cash and equivalents, no short-term investment to divest from and no trading asset securities like previous years to generate any meaningful interest income. On top of that, they have one of their highest ever long-term debt position at $34.7 million, on which they are paying more than $1.6 million annually as interest rates rise in the United States and around the world as inflation runs relatively high. This means that the company will have to either fund operations in the coming few years through issuing more debt, making a buyout less appealing, or making equity offerings, which will further dilute shareholder value and subsequently lower the price per share of a buyout offer, if one may come. Buyout Opportunity - I Just Don't Know Given the fact that Nautilus is an established company with relationships with vendors and manufacturing facilities, it's clear that they CAN be a valuable asset to a private equity company that owns fitness gyms or has some fitness portfolio. I'm not so sure about a public company buyout like Peloton or others, since there's little incentive for that to happen. With the company's $100 million in inventory and still-solid $400 million range revenues projection for the coming year, there is certainly an incentive for someone who can significantly lower the costs of Nautilus and thus generate some profits in the coming year. But at what price? Earlier last year, apparel company Lululemon (LULU) announced it was buying Mirror, a home fitness company, for $500 million as part of its investment in overall fitness markets to expand its reach and avenues to sell their clothing. While I don't think Nautilus will fit their brand, other companies which are hurting from the volatility, which is the apparel and fitness markets, can benefit from having subscription-based services companies and hardware companies in their portfolio. While I'm not going to name names, it's clear that there is a market present for buyers for Nautilus, whether it be athletic companies, athletic apparel companies or private equity with fitness portfolios looking to enhance their reach. Is It Worth A Speculative Buy? It's hard to set a value on the company's worth to a buyer without knowing the portfolio they're trying to expand, but with a book value hovering around $3 per share and an enterprise value of around $100 million, the highest possible potential value the company has is probably around double where it is now. However, there's going to be a discount for the company given their higher debt load as a percentage of the value as well as the fact they're not expected to make anything resembling a profit for quite some time.
Seeking Alpha Aug 09

Nautilus GAAP EPS of -$1.92 misses by $1.20, revenue of $54.82M beats by $4.16M

Nautilus press release (NYSE:NLS): Q1 GAAP EPS of -$1.92 misses by $1.20. Revenue of $54.82M (-70.3% Y/Y) beats by $4.16M. Gross profit margins were 12.7% compared to 30.1% last year. The 17.4 ppt decrease in gross margins was primarily due to increased discounting (-8 ppts), unfavorable logistics overhead absorption (-8 ppts), and increased investments in JRNY (-4 ppts), offset by improvement in other costs (3 ppts). Reiterates FY 2022 Guidance: The company expects full year revenue of between $380 million and $460 million vs. consensus of $398.60 million. Gross margins for the second half of the year are expected to be in the range of 27% to 30%. The company expects to deliver positive Adjusted EBITDA for the 2nd half of FY 2023. As a result, the Company expects full year Adjusted EBITDA loss of between $25 million and $35 million. Shares -6%.

財務状況分析

短期負債: BFXX.Qは マイナスの株主資本 を有しており、これは 短期資産短期負債 をカバーしていないことよりも深刻な状況です。

長期負債: BFXX.Qは株主資本がマイナスであり、これは短期資産が 長期負債 をカバーしていないことよりも深刻な状況です。


デット・ツー・エクイティの歴史と分析

負債レベル: BFXX.Qは 株主資本がマイナス となっており、これは高い負債レベルよりも深刻な状況です。

負債の削減: BFXX.Qの株主資本はマイナスなので、時間の経過とともに負債が減少したかどうかを確認する必要はありません。


貸借対照表


キャッシュ・ランウェイ分析

過去に平均して赤字であった企業については、少なくとも1年間のキャッシュ・ランウェイがあるかどうかを評価する。

安定したキャッシュランウェイ: 利益は出ていないものの、 BFXX.Qは現在のプラスの フリーキャッシュフロー レベルを維持すれば、3 年以上は十分な キャッシュランウェイ を有しています。

キャッシュランウェイの予測: BFXX.Qは利益は出ていませんが、フリーキャッシュフローがプラスで年間5.1 % 減少しているにもかかわらず、3 年以上は十分なキャッシュランウェイがあります。


健全な企業の発掘

企業分析と財務データの現状

データ最終更新日(UTC時間)
企業分析2024/08/19 11:58
終値2024/08/19 00:00
収益2024/03/31
年間収益2024/03/31

データソース

企業分析に使用したデータはS&P Global Market Intelligence LLC のものです。本レポートを作成するための分析モデルでは、以下のデータを使用しています。データは正規化されているため、ソースが利用可能になるまでに時間がかかる場合があります。

パッケージデータタイムフレーム米国ソース例
会社財務10年
  • 損益計算書
  • キャッシュ・フロー計算書
  • 貸借対照表
アナリストのコンセンサス予想+プラス3年
  • 予想財務
  • アナリストの目標株価
市場価格30年
  • 株価
  • 配当、分割、措置
所有権10年
  • トップ株主
  • インサイダー取引
マネジメント10年
  • リーダーシップ・チーム
  • 取締役会
主な進展10年
  • 会社からのお知らせ

* 米国証券を対象とした例であり、非米国証券については、同等の規制書式および情報源を使用

特に断りのない限り、すべての財務データは1年ごとの期間に基づいていますが、四半期ごとに更新されます。これは、TTM(Trailing Twelve Month)またはLTM(Last Twelve Month)データとして知られています。詳細はこちら

分析モデルとスノーフレーク

本レポートを生成するために使用した分析モデルの詳細は当社のGithubページでご覧いただけます。また、レポートの使用方法に関するガイドYoutubeのチュートリアルも掲載しています。

シンプリー・ウォールストリート分析モデルを設計・構築した世界トップクラスのチームについてご紹介します。

業界およびセクターの指標

私たちの業界とセクションの指標は、Simply Wall Stによって6時間ごとに計算されます。

アナリスト筋

BowFlex Inc. 0 これらのアナリストのうち、弊社レポートのインプットとして使用した売上高または利益の予想を提出したのは、 。アナリストの投稿は一日中更新されます。11

アナリスト機関
Rommel DionisioAegis Capital Corporation
Eric WoldB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Steven DyerCraig-Hallum Capital Group LLC