Forte Biosciences, Inc.

NasdaqCM:FBRX Rapport sur les actions

Capitalisation boursière : US$1.9b

Forte Biosciences Gestion

Gestion contrôle des critères 2/4

Le PDG Forte Biosciences est Paul A. Wagner, nommé en Jan2018, a un mandat de 8.5 ans. La rémunération annuelle totale est $ 7.36M, composée du salaire de 9.1% et des bonus 90.9%, y compris les actions et options de la société. détient directement 0.35% des actions de la société, d'une valeur de $ 6.58M. La durée moyenne de mandat de l'équipe de direction et du conseil d'administration est respectivement 5.3 ans et 3.9 ans.

Informations clés

Paul A. Wagner

Directeur général

US$7.4m

Rémunération totale

Pourcentage du salaire du PDG9.11%
Durée du mandat du directeur général8.5yrs
Propriété du PDG0.3%
Durée moyenne d'occupation des postes de direction5.3yrs
Durée moyenne du mandat des membres du conseil d'administration3.9yrs

Mises à jour récentes de la gestion

Recent updates

Article d’analyse Nov 11

We're Not Very Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, Forte Biosciences...
Article d’analyse Apr 19

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, although Amazon.com made...
Article d’analyse Jul 17

We're A Little Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Article d’analyse Mar 14

Is Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Just because a business does not make any money, does not mean that the stock will go down. For example, although...
Seeking Alpha Aug 24

Large Forte Biosciences shareholder scolds company board of directors

Funicular Funds, which owns 8% of the outstanding shares of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX), excoriated the company's board of directors in a letter over a recent capital raise. In an SEC filing, Funicular said the letter addressed the "Board’s failure to address the legitimate concerns previously raised by stockholders and its decision to embark on a value-destructive, scorched-earth path with a dilutive and unnecessary capital raise, without so much as an explanation for its actions." Funicular is asking to establish a committee of independent directors to investigate shareholder concerns. In July, a pair of large shareholders demanded changes at Forte (FBRX), including a suggestion that the company liquidate.
Article d’analyse Aug 17

We're Hopeful That Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Will Use Its Cash Wisely

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining...
Seeking Alpha Aug 16

Forte Biosciences: Lots Of Clinical Risk Ahead And A Questionable Business Plan

FB-401, the lead asset failed in clinical trials. The company has one very early-stage asset they intend to move forward in the clinic, FB-102. Investors are likely to encounter dilution, a high degree of clinical risk and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether FB-401 has any advantages over other therapeutics. Summary Creativity is not my strength so I am reusing the title from an article that I wrote a few months back about Vyne Therapeutics, another dermatology company. The shares of Vyne have fallen 60% since then. The story is at Forte is essentially the same and all too common in biotech. Vyne and Forte both experienced setbacks, institutional investors sold and long term investors have fared poorly. Most importantly, for both companies, there is a suboptimal plan to move forward that exposes investors to a high degree of clinical risk, requires hundreds of millions of capital and has a low chance of rewarding investors in a manner commensurate with this outsized risk. I will outline a few reasons I rate Forte Biosciences (FBRX) a SELL Institutional Investors Major institutional investors have sold and cut their losses. Forte Biosciences had an enviable roster of professional investors including BVF, Orbimed and Perceptive Advisors. These are seasoned investors with a staff of PhD/MDs who are highly capable of assessing the future likelihood of success. All three funds sold their entire stake in the company. This is not always the case after a clinical failure. There are many cases where institutional investors increase their stake at a low price. Three institutional investors selling their entire stake strongly suggests these professionals do not see a bright future. For an unprofitable biotech company, institutional investors are an important source of capital. Funding an unprofitable biotech in the capital markets is very challenging currently. It is not clear Forte will be able to obtain future funding and if they do, terms will likely be unfavorable. What is clear is they have very limited cash ($38.5 m currently) and they will need hundreds of million to develop the new molecule. In fact, they have a shelf registration in place. Investors should expect substantial dilution. The Plan Forward The asset the company intends to move forward after the failure of FB-401 in atopic dermatitis is FB-102. Given this asset is in the very early stages of testing, prudence dictates an assessment as to whether the risk is worth the potential reward. This molecule may enter the clinic for testing as late as 2024. The company's presentation noted development plans in graft versus host disease (GvHD), vitiligo and alopecia areata which represent combined markets of over $6 billion. Each indication will require separate clinical trials to prove safety and efficacy adding substantially to the cost of development. Each of these indications has standard of care treatments. The company notes an unmet medical need. GvHD is a disease where there is a legitimate unmet need but there are other companies much further along in testing including Seres Therapeutics (MCRB) and MaaT Pharma. The unmet need may be satisfied by these entrants and MaaT has already produced favorable safety and efficacy data. Alopecia and vitiligo have very effective treatments currently-JAK inhibitors. The company noted the safety profile of JAK inhibitors. Opzelura is a topical JAK and most Doctors consider the safety profile of the cream to be of no concern whatsoever. In alopecia, where oral JAKS are approved, the safety and efficacy data for all 3 JAK inhibitors (Pfizer, Lilly and Concert) has been favorable but there is a black box warning. From an efficacy standpoint, there is no unmet need. From a safety standpoint, the mechanism of action and side effect profile are related. The JAK inhibitors work in vitiligo and alopecia areata by suppressing the immune system. There is nothing to suggest FB-102 can achieve the suppression of the immune system required for efficacy without the same safety issues. Investors are going to spend hundreds of million dollars developing treatments in indications where there are either treatments approved or assets years ahead of Forte's molecule, FB-102. Investors are taking on a huge amount of risk to enter crowded markets with little assurance of any competitive advantage. Of course, there is also the possibility the molecule does not show efficacy or adequate safety and needs to abandoned leaving Forte with no assets. To make development of FB-102 worthwhile, it would have to offer a benefit over existing treatments. The company presentation does not include the mechanism of action of FB-102 making it impossible to ascertain whether the "proprietary molecule" that involves "antagonism of a pathway for autoimmune disease" has any advantages or is even likely to work. The company cites infrequent dosing as a potential benefit of the treatment. This is an extraordinarily poor reason to spend hundreds of millions to develop a treatment. Dosing is a very unimportant issue in diseases such as GvHD which can be fatal. Vitiligo and alopecia areata are diseases where patients have skin discolorations or baldness and patients are highly motivated to take their medicine.
Seeking Alpha Jul 07

Forte Biosciences large shareholders make demands for company's future

A pair of large shareholders of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) are making demands that could impact the company's future, including the suggestion that the company liquidate. In a Wednesday SEC filing, Brad Leonard, managing member of BML Capital Management, which has a 9.1% stake in common shares, wrote that "Forte shareholders would be best served by a complete liquidation as soon as possible." Forte (FBRX) and some shareholders have been at odds over the future of Forte's only asset, FB-102, which is in the preclinical stage for several indications, including alopecia and vitiligo, a conditions that affects skin pigmentation. Leonard noted that since a May announcement on development plans, there has not been a single insider purchase. On Tuesday, Jacob Ma-Weaver, managing member of Funicular Funds, said in a SEC filing that Forte's board had yet to make an "adequate assessment of the potential immediate value creation that could be achieved through a substantial buyback program, tender offer at a premium, or special dividend." Funicular has a 7.5% stake. Seeking Alpha's Quant Rating views Forte (FBRX) as a hold with the only high grade being for valuation.
Article d’analyse Dec 23

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Article d’analyse Mar 13

Are Insiders Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Stock?

We often see insiders buying up shares in companies that perform well over the long term. The flip side of that is that...
Article d’analyse Jan 19

Do Institutions Own Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

A look at the shareholders of Forte Biosciences, Inc. ( NASDAQ:FBRX ) can tell us which group is most powerful...
Article d’analyse Nov 25

Who Has Been Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

We've lost count of how many times insiders have accumulated shares in a company that goes on to improve markedly. The...

Analyse de la rémunération des PDG

Comment la rémunération de Paul A. Wagner a-t-elle évolué par rapport aux bénéfices de Forte Biosciences?
DateRémunération totaleSalaireBénéfices de l'entreprise
Mar 31 2026n/an/a

-US$76m

Dec 31 2025US$7mUS$670k

-US$69m

Sep 30 2025n/an/a

-US$52m

Jun 30 2025n/an/a

-US$42m

Mar 31 2025n/an/a

-US$44m

Dec 31 2024US$2mUS$644k

-US$35m

Sep 30 2024n/an/a

-US$34m

Jun 30 2024n/an/a

-US$36m

Mar 31 2024n/an/a

-US$32m

Dec 31 2023US$1mUS$620k

-US$31m

Sep 30 2023n/an/a

-US$30m

Jun 30 2023n/an/a

-US$24m

Mar 31 2023n/an/a

-US$18m

Dec 31 2022US$1mUS$590k

-US$14m

Sep 30 2022n/an/a

-US$12m

Jun 30 2022n/an/a

-US$17m

Mar 31 2022n/an/a

-US$19m

Dec 31 2021US$5mUS$590k

-US$22m

Sep 30 2021n/an/a

-US$23m

Jun 30 2021n/an/a

-US$20m

Mar 31 2021n/an/a

-US$49m

Dec 31 2020US$777kUS$453k

-US$46m

Sep 30 2020n/an/a

-US$43m

Jun 30 2020n/an/a

-US$39m

Mar 31 2020n/an/a

-US$5m

Dec 31 2019US$525kUS$350k

-US$4m

Rémunération vs marché: La rémunération totale de Paul A. ($USD 7.36M ) est supérieure à la moyenne des entreprises de taille similaire sur le marché US ($USD 5.16M ).

Rémunération et revenus: La rémunération de Paul A. a augmenté alors que l'entreprise n'est pas rentable.


PDG

Paul A. Wagner (56 yo)

8.5yrs
Titularisation
US$7,358,587
Compensation

Dr. Paul A. Wagner, CFA, Ph.D. has been the Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy & Development and Chief Business Officer at CANbridge Life Sciences Ltd. since October 16, 2017. Dr. Wagner leads CAN...


Équipe de direction

NomPositionTitularisationCompensationPropriété
Paul A. Wagner
CEO, President & Chairman8.5yrsUS$7.36m0.35%
$ 6.6m
Antony Riley
Chief Financial Officer6.3yrsUS$2.72m0.17%
$ 3.3m
Barbara Finck
Senior Medical Clinician & Director2.3yrsUS$786.72k0%
$ 0
Christopher Roenfeldt
Chief Operating Officer4.2yrspas de donnéespas de données
5.3yrs
Durée moyenne de l'emploi
59yo
Âge moyen

Gestion expérimentée: L'équipe dirigeante de FBRX est chevronnée et expérimentée (5.3 années d'ancienneté moyenne).


Membres du conseil d'administration

NomPositionTitularisationCompensationPropriété
Paul A. Wagner
CEO, President & Chairman9.5yrsUS$7.36m0.35%
$ 6.6m
Barbara Finck
Senior Medical Clinician & Director4.3yrsUS$786.72k0%
$ 0
David Gryska
Independent Director3.5yrsUS$252.61k0.024%
$ 457.3k
Richard Vincent
Independent Director1.8yrsUS$271.74k0%
$ 0
Lawrence F. Eichenfield
Chair of Scientific Advisory Boardno dataUS$95.84kpas de données
Stephen Doberstein
Independent Director4.2yrsUS$250.02k0%
$ 0
Steven Kornfeld
Independent Director6.1yrsUS$288.15k0.016%
$ 304.9k
Shivpreet Kapoor
Independent Director1.8yrsUS$248.04k0%
$ 0
Scott Brun
Independent Director3.7yrsUS$255.02k0%
$ 0
3.9yrs
Durée moyenne de l'emploi
62yo
Âge moyen

Conseil d'administration expérimenté: Les membres du conseil d'administration de FBRX sont considérés comme expérimentés (ancienneté moyenne 3.9 ans).


Analyse de l'entreprise et données financières

DonnéesDernière mise à jour (heure UTC)
Analyse de l'entreprise2026/07/31 10:15
Cours de l'action en fin de journée2026/07/31 00:00
Les revenus2026/03/31
Revenus annuels2025/12/31

Sources de données

Les données utilisées dans notre analyse de l'entreprise proviennent de S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. Les données suivantes sont utilisées dans notre modèle d'analyse pour générer ce rapport. Les données sont normalisées, ce qui peut entraîner un délai avant que la source ne soit disponible.

PaquetDonnéesCadre temporelExemple de source américaine *
Finances de l'entreprise10 ans
  • Compte de résultat
  • Tableau des flux de trésorerie
  • Bilan
Estimations consensuelles des analystes+3 ans
  • Prévisions financières
  • Objectifs de prix des analystes
Prix du marché30 ans
  • Cours des actions
  • Dividendes, scissions et actions
Propriété10 ans
  • Actionnaires principaux
  • Délits d'initiés
Gestion10 ans
  • L'équipe dirigeante
  • Conseil d'administration
Principaux développements10 ans
  • Annonces de l'entreprise

* Exemple pour les titres américains ; pour les titres non américains, des formulaires réglementaires et des sources équivalentes sont utilisés.

Sauf indication contraire, toutes les données financières sont basées sur une période annuelle mais mises à jour trimestriellement. C'est ce qu'on appelle les données des douze derniers mois (TTM) ou des douze derniers mois (LTM). En savoir plus.

Modèle d'analyse et flocon de neige

Les détails du modèle d’analyse utilisé pour générer ce rapport sont disponibles sur notre page Github ; nous proposons également des guides sur la façon d’utiliser nos rapports et des tutoriels sur YouTube.

Découvrez l'équipe de classe mondiale qui a conçu et construit le modèle d'analyse Simply Wall St.

Indicateurs de l'industrie et du secteur

Nos indicateurs de secteur et de section sont calculés toutes les 6 heures par Simply Wall St. Les détails de notre processus sont disponibles sur Github.

Sources des analystes

Forte Biosciences, Inc. est couverte par 10 analystes. 3 de ces analystes ont soumis les estimations de revenus ou de bénéfices utilisées comme données d'entrée dans notre rapport. Les soumissions des analystes sont mises à jour tout au long de la journée.

AnalysteInstitution
Etzer DaroutBarclays
Kalpit PatelB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Kumaraguru RajaBrookline Capital Markets