Forte Biosciences, Inc.

Informe acción NasdaqCM:FBRX

Capitalización de mercado: US$1.9b

Forte Biosciences Resultados de beneficios anteriores

Pasado controles de criterios 0/6

Los beneficios de Forte Biosciences han disminuido a una tasa media anual de -32.9%, mientras que en la industria Biotechs los beneficios crecieron en un 33.7% anualmente.

Información clave

-32.89%

Tasa de crecimiento de los beneficios

36.24%

Tasa de crecimiento del BPA

Crecimiento de la industria Biotechs 17.04%
Tasa de crecimiento de los ingresosn/a
Rentabilidad financiera-47.85%
Margen neton/a
Última actualización de beneficios30 Jun 2026

Actualizaciones de resultados anteriores recientes

No hay actualizaciones

Recent updates

Artículo de análisis Nov 11

We're Not Very Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, Forte Biosciences...
Artículo de análisis Apr 19

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, although Amazon.com made...
Artículo de análisis Jul 17

We're A Little Worried About Forte Biosciences' (NASDAQ:FBRX) Cash Burn Rate

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Artículo de análisis Mar 14

Is Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) In A Good Position To Deliver On Growth Plans?

Just because a business does not make any money, does not mean that the stock will go down. For example, although...
Seeking Alpha Aug 24

Large Forte Biosciences shareholder scolds company board of directors

Funicular Funds, which owns 8% of the outstanding shares of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX), excoriated the company's board of directors in a letter over a recent capital raise. In an SEC filing, Funicular said the letter addressed the "Board’s failure to address the legitimate concerns previously raised by stockholders and its decision to embark on a value-destructive, scorched-earth path with a dilutive and unnecessary capital raise, without so much as an explanation for its actions." Funicular is asking to establish a committee of independent directors to investigate shareholder concerns. In July, a pair of large shareholders demanded changes at Forte (FBRX), including a suggestion that the company liquidate.
Artículo de análisis Aug 17

We're Hopeful That Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Will Use Its Cash Wisely

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, biotech and mining...
Seeking Alpha Aug 16

Forte Biosciences: Lots Of Clinical Risk Ahead And A Questionable Business Plan

FB-401, the lead asset failed in clinical trials. The company has one very early-stage asset they intend to move forward in the clinic, FB-102. Investors are likely to encounter dilution, a high degree of clinical risk and there is insufficient evidence to assess whether FB-401 has any advantages over other therapeutics. Summary Creativity is not my strength so I am reusing the title from an article that I wrote a few months back about Vyne Therapeutics, another dermatology company. The shares of Vyne have fallen 60% since then. The story is at Forte is essentially the same and all too common in biotech. Vyne and Forte both experienced setbacks, institutional investors sold and long term investors have fared poorly. Most importantly, for both companies, there is a suboptimal plan to move forward that exposes investors to a high degree of clinical risk, requires hundreds of millions of capital and has a low chance of rewarding investors in a manner commensurate with this outsized risk. I will outline a few reasons I rate Forte Biosciences (FBRX) a SELL Institutional Investors Major institutional investors have sold and cut their losses. Forte Biosciences had an enviable roster of professional investors including BVF, Orbimed and Perceptive Advisors. These are seasoned investors with a staff of PhD/MDs who are highly capable of assessing the future likelihood of success. All three funds sold their entire stake in the company. This is not always the case after a clinical failure. There are many cases where institutional investors increase their stake at a low price. Three institutional investors selling their entire stake strongly suggests these professionals do not see a bright future. For an unprofitable biotech company, institutional investors are an important source of capital. Funding an unprofitable biotech in the capital markets is very challenging currently. It is not clear Forte will be able to obtain future funding and if they do, terms will likely be unfavorable. What is clear is they have very limited cash ($38.5 m currently) and they will need hundreds of million to develop the new molecule. In fact, they have a shelf registration in place. Investors should expect substantial dilution. The Plan Forward The asset the company intends to move forward after the failure of FB-401 in atopic dermatitis is FB-102. Given this asset is in the very early stages of testing, prudence dictates an assessment as to whether the risk is worth the potential reward. This molecule may enter the clinic for testing as late as 2024. The company's presentation noted development plans in graft versus host disease (GvHD), vitiligo and alopecia areata which represent combined markets of over $6 billion. Each indication will require separate clinical trials to prove safety and efficacy adding substantially to the cost of development. Each of these indications has standard of care treatments. The company notes an unmet medical need. GvHD is a disease where there is a legitimate unmet need but there are other companies much further along in testing including Seres Therapeutics (MCRB) and MaaT Pharma. The unmet need may be satisfied by these entrants and MaaT has already produced favorable safety and efficacy data. Alopecia and vitiligo have very effective treatments currently-JAK inhibitors. The company noted the safety profile of JAK inhibitors. Opzelura is a topical JAK and most Doctors consider the safety profile of the cream to be of no concern whatsoever. In alopecia, where oral JAKS are approved, the safety and efficacy data for all 3 JAK inhibitors (Pfizer, Lilly and Concert) has been favorable but there is a black box warning. From an efficacy standpoint, there is no unmet need. From a safety standpoint, the mechanism of action and side effect profile are related. The JAK inhibitors work in vitiligo and alopecia areata by suppressing the immune system. There is nothing to suggest FB-102 can achieve the suppression of the immune system required for efficacy without the same safety issues. Investors are going to spend hundreds of million dollars developing treatments in indications where there are either treatments approved or assets years ahead of Forte's molecule, FB-102. Investors are taking on a huge amount of risk to enter crowded markets with little assurance of any competitive advantage. Of course, there is also the possibility the molecule does not show efficacy or adequate safety and needs to abandoned leaving Forte with no assets. To make development of FB-102 worthwhile, it would have to offer a benefit over existing treatments. The company presentation does not include the mechanism of action of FB-102 making it impossible to ascertain whether the "proprietary molecule" that involves "antagonism of a pathway for autoimmune disease" has any advantages or is even likely to work. The company cites infrequent dosing as a potential benefit of the treatment. This is an extraordinarily poor reason to spend hundreds of millions to develop a treatment. Dosing is a very unimportant issue in diseases such as GvHD which can be fatal. Vitiligo and alopecia areata are diseases where patients have skin discolorations or baldness and patients are highly motivated to take their medicine.
Seeking Alpha Jul 07

Forte Biosciences large shareholders make demands for company's future

A pair of large shareholders of Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) are making demands that could impact the company's future, including the suggestion that the company liquidate. In a Wednesday SEC filing, Brad Leonard, managing member of BML Capital Management, which has a 9.1% stake in common shares, wrote that "Forte shareholders would be best served by a complete liquidation as soon as possible." Forte (FBRX) and some shareholders have been at odds over the future of Forte's only asset, FB-102, which is in the preclinical stage for several indications, including alopecia and vitiligo, a conditions that affects skin pigmentation. Leonard noted that since a May announcement on development plans, there has not been a single insider purchase. On Tuesday, Jacob Ma-Weaver, managing member of Funicular Funds, said in a SEC filing that Forte's board had yet to make an "adequate assessment of the potential immediate value creation that could be achieved through a substantial buyback program, tender offer at a premium, or special dividend." Funicular has a 7.5% stake. Seeking Alpha's Quant Rating views Forte (FBRX) as a hold with the only high grade being for valuation.
Artículo de análisis Dec 23

We Think Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) Needs To Drive Business Growth Carefully

There's no doubt that money can be made by owning shares of unprofitable businesses. For example, although Amazon.com...
Artículo de análisis Mar 13

Are Insiders Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Stock?

We often see insiders buying up shares in companies that perform well over the long term. The flip side of that is that...
Artículo de análisis Jan 19

Do Institutions Own Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

A look at the shareholders of Forte Biosciences, Inc. ( NASDAQ:FBRX ) can tell us which group is most powerful...
Artículo de análisis Nov 25

Who Has Been Buying Forte Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:FBRX) Shares?

We've lost count of how many times insiders have accumulated shares in a company that goes on to improve markedly. The...

Desglose de ingresos y gastos

Cómo gana y gasta dinero Forte Biosciences. Basado en los últimos beneficios reportados, en base a los últimos doce meses (LTM).


Historial de beneficios e ingresos

NasdaqCM:FBRX Ingresos, gastos y beneficios (USD Millions)
FechaIngresosBeneficiosGastos G+AGastos de I+D
30 Jun 260-881080
31 Mar 260-761166
31 Dec 250-691258
30 Sep 250-521242
30 Jun 250-421132
31 Mar 250-441530
31 Dec 240-351521
30 Sep 240-341620
30 Jun 240-361720
31 Mar 240-321221
31 Dec 230-311122
30 Sep 230-301021
30 Jun 230-24816
31 Mar 230-18910
31 Dec 220-1486
30 Sep 220-1284
30 Jun 220-1789
31 Mar 220-19811
31 Dec 210-22814
30 Sep 210-23716
30 Jun 210-20614
31 Mar 210-49512
31 Dec 200-46410
30 Sep 200-4338
30 Jun 200-3925
31 Mar 200-523
31 Dec 190-413

Ingresos de calidad: FBRX actualmente no es rentable.

Margen de beneficios creciente: FBRX actualmente no es rentable.


Análisis del flujo de caja libre vs. Beneficios


Análisis del crecimiento de los beneficios en el pasado

Tendencia de beneficios: FBRX no es rentable, y las pérdidas han aumentado en los últimos 5 años a un ritmo de 32.9% al año.

Acelerando crecimiento: No se puede comparar el crecimiento de los beneficios de FBRX en el último año con su promedio de 5 años, ya que actualmente no es rentable.

Beneficios vs. Industria: FBRX no es rentable, por lo que resulta difícil comparar el crecimiento de sus beneficios en el último año con el de la industria Biotechs (67.9%).


Rentabilidad financiera

Alta ROE: FBRX tiene una rentabilidad financiera negativa (-47.85%), ya que actualmente no es rentable.


Rentabilidad económica


Rendimiento del capital invertido


Descubre empresas con buenos resultados en el pasado

Análisis de la empresa y estado de los datos financieros

DatosÚltima actualización (huso horario UTC)
Análisis de la empresa2026/08/14 14:00
Precio de las acciones al final del día2026/08/14 00:00
Beneficios2026/06/30
Ingresos anuales2025/12/31

Fuentes de datos

Los datos utilizados en nuestro análisis de empresas proceden de S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC. Los siguientes datos se utilizan en nuestro modelo de análisis para generar este informe. Los datos están normalizados, lo que puede introducir un retraso desde que la fuente está disponible.

PaqueteDatosMarco temporalEjemplo Fuente EE.UU. *
Finanzas de la empresa10 años
  • Cuenta de resultados
  • Estado de tesorería
  • Balance
Estimaciones del consenso de analistas+3 años
  • Previsiones financieras
  • Objetivos de precios de los analistas
Precios de mercado30 años
  • Precios de las acciones
  • Dividendos, escisiones y acciones
Propiedad10 años
  • Accionistas principales
  • Información privilegiada
Gestión10 años
  • Equipo directivo
  • Consejo de Administración
Principales avances10 años
  • Anuncios de empresas

* Ejemplo para valores de EE.UU., para no EE.UU. se utilizan formularios y fuentes normativas equivalentes.

A menos que se especifique lo contrario, todos los datos financieros se basan en un periodo anual, pero se actualizan trimestralmente. Esto se conoce como datos de los últimos doce meses (TTM) o de los últimos doce meses (LTM). Más información.

Modelo de análisis y copo de nieve

Los detalles del modelo de análisis utilizado para generar este informe están disponibles en nuestra página de Github, también tenemos guías sobre cómo utilizar nuestros informes y tutoriales en Youtube.

Conozca al equipo de talla mundial que diseñó y construyó el modelo de análisis Simply Wall St.

Métricas industriales y sectoriales

Simply Wall St calcula cada 6 horas nuestras métricas sectoriales y de sección. Los detalles de nuestro proceso están disponibles en Github.

Fuentes analistas

Forte Biosciences, Inc. está cubierta por 10 analistas. 3 de esos analistas presentaron las estimaciones de ingresos o ganancias utilizadas como datos para nuestro informe. Las estimaciones de los analistas se actualizan a lo largo del día.

AnalistaInstitución
Etzer DaroutBarclays
Kalpit PatelB. Riley Securities, Inc.
Kumaraguru RajaBrookline Capital Markets