Dashboard
Portfolios
Watchlist
Community
Discover
Screener
HU
humberto_iskjh
Community Contributor
Member since 2026
Views
0
Total number of views
Fair Values Set
0
Total number of fair values set
Comments
2
Total number of comments
Followers
0
Total number of followers
No bio added yet
No link added
Narratives
Watchlists
Portfolios
Discussions
Likes
ELTX
·
2 months ago
Study on track for success
For me, one of the most interesting reference points would be the mFOLFIRINOX arm from the PRODIGE 24 trial (mDFS ~21 months). Considering that arm was enriched with fitter patients able to tolerate the treatment, and that Gem and GemCap are still widely used in real-world practice, it probably wouldn’t be unreasonable to subtract at least 2–3 months from that benchmark. That would make the timing analysis end up quite close to the conclusion you originally reached using the 6-month adjustment. The one thing we still don’t know there is the MRD distribution. In any case, the time-to-event ratio certainly looks very favorable. Thanks as well for your analyses — they’re very insightful.
0
|
0
ELTX
·
2 months ago
Study on track for success
If enrollment was allowed up to 6 months after chemo, wouldn’t it be more realistic to use an average adjustment of ~3 months to account for the timing gap between the reference points? Thanks in advance.
0
|
0