Loading...

ET: Cash Returns And Upcoming Distribution Growth Will Drive Future Upside

Published
19 Aug 24
Updated
13 Dec 25
Views
2.5k
n/a
n/a
AnalystConsensusTarget's Fair Value
n/a
Loading
1Y
-12.2%
7D
-1.9%

Author's Valuation

US$21.5524.1% undervalued intrinsic discount

AnalystConsensusTarget Fair Value

Last Update 13 Dec 25

Fair value Decreased 0.58%

ET: Diversified Footprint And Cash Returns Will Support Future Upside

Analysts have modestly reduced their fair value estimate for Energy Transfer to approximately $21.55 from about $21.67, reflecting slightly higher discount rate assumptions, offset by somewhat stronger long term revenue growth and margin expectations, as well as a marginally lower future P/E multiple amid mixed but generally constructive revisions to Street price targets.

Analyst Commentary

Recent Street research presents a mixed but generally constructive view on Energy Transfer, with modest adjustments to price targets reflecting both confidence in the business model and recognition of macro and competitive headwinds.

Bullish Takeaways

  • Bullish analysts continue to see upside to current trading levels, with updated targets in the low 20s grounded in the partnership's diversified footprint and scaled platform.
  • Q3 performance is cited as evidence that Energy Transfer's multi basin exposure and broad asset base provide a natural hedge, supporting more resilient cash flows through commodity price volatility.
  • Some valuation frameworks emphasize the potential for increased capital discipline and prioritization of cash returns, which could support a higher multiple over time despite modest target trims.
  • Long term growth in volumes across core systems and the ability to leverage existing infrastructure are viewed as key drivers underpinning revenue and margin durability.

Bearish Takeaways

  • Bearish analysts highlight limited absolute growth in natural gas as a constraint on top line expansion, tempering expectations for a material valuation re rating.
  • Weakness in the oil macro and intensifying competition in Permian NGLs are seen as structural headwinds that could pressure segment level margins and returns on incremental capital.
  • The perceived lack of near term catalysts, beyond steady cash generation and distributions, leads some to prefer a neutral stance despite an apparently undemanding valuation.
  • Target price reductions in the high teens reflect concerns that macro uncertainty and competitive dynamics could cap multiple expansion, even if operational execution remains solid.

What's in the News

  • Announced plans to build the Mustang Draw II 250 MMcf/d natural gas processing plant and related facilities in the Midland Basin, targeted to be in service in the fourth quarter of 2026 (Key Developments).
  • Entered a 20 year firm transportation agreement with Entergy Louisiana for an initial 250,000 MMBtu per day beginning February 2028, supporting regional power generation and data center growth, including Meta's new hyperscale facility in Richland Parish (Key Developments).
  • Signed a strategic agreement with FourPoint Resources to double the Price River Terminal's export capacity in Utah, adding major rail, storage, and loading enhancements to support growing American Premium Uinta crude volumes (Key Developments).
  • Increased its quarterly cash distribution to $0.3325 per common unit, or $1.33 on an annualized basis, for the third quarter of 2025, up more than 3 percent versus the prior year period (Key Developments).
  • Reported completion of its share repurchase program launched in 2015, having bought back 39,768,205 shares for approximately $1.12 billion in total, with no shares repurchased in the latest tranche period (Key Developments).

Valuation Changes

  • Fair Value Estimate edged lower from approximately $21.67 to about $21.55 per unit, reflecting a modest net reduction of around $0.12.
  • Discount Rate increased slightly from roughly 7.90 percent to about 7.92 percent, implying a marginally higher required return on equity.
  • Revenue Growth moved modestly higher from around 7.67 percent to approximately 7.95 percent, indicating a somewhat stronger long term top line outlook.
  • Net Profit Margin ticked up from about 6.26 percent to roughly 6.29 percent, suggesting a minor improvement in expected profitability.
  • Future P/E declined slightly from roughly 15.0x to about 14.8x, signaling a small reduction in the multiple applied to forward earnings.

Key Takeaways

  • Expanding pipeline and export infrastructure, alongside strong customer commitments, positions Energy Transfer to capture rising domestic and global energy demand with de-risked revenue streams.
  • Proven success in growth projects and mergers enhances earnings visibility, margin improvement, and long-term upside as natural gas remains a key transitional energy source.
  • Heavy reliance on large, long-term projects and fossil fuel demand faces execution, contracting, regulatory, and competitive risks, while energy transition trends threaten future utilization and margins.

Catalysts

About Energy Transfer
    Provides energy-related services in the United States.
What are the underlying business or industry changes driving this perspective?
  • Energy Transfer is ramping up substantial investments in new natural gas pipelines (e.g., Desert Southwest, Hugh Brinson) and storage projects to address projected surges in U.S. power generation and data center demand, leading to higher future contracted volumes and fee-based revenues.
  • The company's NGL export capacity expansions at the Nederland terminal and new pipeline loopings position it to benefit from increased U.S. hydrocarbon exports to international markets, supporting sustained throughput and export revenues as global energy demand rises.
  • Recent long-term, investment-grade customer commitments on multi-billion-dollar projects de-risk cash flows and improve visibility into earnings growth, while the buildout of vertically integrated infrastructure (like Lake Charles LNG tied to ET pipelines) enhances both margins and return on invested capital.
  • Secular resilience of natural gas as a bridge fuel, amid global decarbonization efforts, supports long-duration utilization rates for ET's infrastructure, especially as global and U.S. population growth continues to drive baseline energy demand.
  • Aggressive organic growth project backlog (many expected to deliver mid-teen returns from 2026 onward) and a proven history of successful M&A provide strong forward visibility into distributable cash flow and earnings growth, likely supporting valuation re-rating over time.

Energy Transfer Earnings and Revenue Growth

Energy Transfer Future Earnings and Revenue Growth

Assumptions

How have these above catalysts been quantified?
  • Analysts are assuming Energy Transfer's revenue will grow by 7.4% annually over the next 3 years.
  • Analysts assume that profit margins will increase from 5.5% today to 6.7% in 3 years time.
  • Analysts expect earnings to reach $6.7 billion (and earnings per share of $1.92) by about September 2028, up from $4.5 billion today. However, there is a considerable amount of disagreement amongst the analysts with the most bullish expecting $7.6 billion in earnings, and the most bearish expecting $4.1 billion.
  • In order for the above numbers to justify the analysts price target, the company would need to trade at a PE ratio of 14.9x on those 2028 earnings, up from 13.2x today. This future PE is greater than the current PE for the US Oil and Gas industry at 12.6x.
  • Analysts expect the number of shares outstanding to grow by 0.26% per year for the next 3 years.
  • To value all of this in today's terms, we will use a discount rate of 8.57%, as per the Simply Wall St company report.

Energy Transfer Future Earnings Per Share Growth

Energy Transfer Future Earnings Per Share Growth

Risks

What could happen that would invalidate this narrative?
  • Energy Transfer is experiencing a weaker than expected growth in both Bakken and Permian crude oil and gas volumes, partly due to lower volumes, deferred completions, and curtailments, as well as unexpected cold weather impacts-posing risks to revenue and near-term earnings if these trends continue.
  • The company's future growth relies heavily on large-scale, multi-billion-dollar organic projects (e.g., Desert Southwest and Hugh Brinson pipelines, Lake Charles LNG), which involve extended permitting/build periods and traditional midstream risk structures-elevating the risk of cost overruns, regulatory delays, and execution challenges that could negatively affect margins and cash flows.
  • Energy Transfer's strategy is increasingly tied to new, long-term contractual commitments related to natural gas demand from data centers, gas-fired power, and international LNG; however, much of the incremental demand is not yet fully contracted, is subject to changing market conditions, and faces regulatory/permitting uncertainties, which could impact long-term revenue growth and project utilization rates.
  • Intensifying NGL pipeline competition in the Permian and shifting optimization opportunities may pressure volumes and blending/storage margins for core NGL assets, while international relations and geopolitical events (e.g., the recent ethane export disruption with China) might hinder export growth, limiting revenue and EBITDA expansion.
  • Although Energy Transfer is bullish on long-term hydrocarbon demand, secular trends such as the global acceleration of renewable energy adoption, decarbonization mandates, and enhanced ESG investor scrutiny threaten long-term fossil fuel infrastructure utilization, potentially leading to declining long-term throughput, elevated cost of capital, and compressed earnings and margin profiles.

Valuation

How have all the factors above been brought together to estimate a fair value?
  • The analysts have a consensus price target of $22.552 for Energy Transfer based on their expectations of its future earnings growth, profit margins and other risk factors. However, there is a degree of disagreement amongst analysts, with the most bullish reporting a price target of $25.0, and the most bearish reporting a price target of just $20.0.
  • In order for you to agree with the analyst's consensus, you'd need to believe that by 2028, revenues will be $99.8 billion, earnings will come to $6.7 billion, and it would be trading on a PE ratio of 14.9x, assuming you use a discount rate of 8.6%.
  • Given the current share price of $17.17, the analyst price target of $22.55 is 23.9% higher.
  • We always encourage you to reach your own conclusions though. So sense check these analyst numbers against your own assumptions and expectations based on your understanding of the business and what you believe is probable.

Have other thoughts on Energy Transfer?

Create your own narrative on this stock, and estimate its Fair Value using our Valuator tool.

Create Narrative

How well do narratives help inform your perspective?

Disclaimer

AnalystConsensusTarget is a tool utilizing a Large Language Model (LLM) that ingests data on consensus price targets, forecasted revenue and earnings figures, as well as the transcripts of earnings calls to produce qualitative analysis. The narratives produced by AnalystConsensusTarget are general in nature and are based solely on analyst data and publicly-available material published by the respective companies. These scenarios are not indicative of the company's future performance and are exploratory in nature. Simply Wall St has no position in the company(s) mentioned. Simply Wall St may provide the securities issuer or related entities with website advertising services for a fee, on an arm's length basis. These relationships have no impact on the way we conduct our business, the content we host, or how our content is served to users. The price targets and estimates used are consensus data, and do not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and they do not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Note that AnalystConsensusTarget's analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

Read more narratives