Is Hitech (NSE:HITECHCORP) Using Too Much Debt?

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Hitech Corporation Limited (NSE:HITECHCORP) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for Hitech

What Is Hitech's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Hitech had ₹960.2m of debt in March 2022, down from ₹1.44b, one year before. And it doesn't have much cash, so its net debt is about the same.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NSEI:HITECHCORP Debt to Equity History June 10th 2022

How Healthy Is Hitech's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Hitech had liabilities of ₹903.0m due within a year, and liabilities of ₹466.5m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had ₹9.59m in cash and ₹447.9m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by ₹912.0m.

Given Hitech has a market capitalization of ₹4.61b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.1 and interest cover of 3.5 times, it seems to us that Hitech is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. So we'd recommend keeping a close eye on the impact financing costs are having on the business. Importantly, Hitech grew its EBIT by 61% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since Hitech will need earnings to service that debt. So when considering debt, it's definitely worth looking at the earnings trend. Click here for an interactive snapshot.

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Happily for any shareholders, Hitech actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT over the last three years. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

Our View

Hitech's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its interest cover. Looking at the bigger picture, we think Hitech's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. After all, sensible leverage can boost returns on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Hitech is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Hitech might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NSEI:HITECHCORP

Hitech

Engages in rigid plastic packaging solution business in India.

Moderate risk with proven track record and pays a dividend.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

DA
davidlsander
OPTH logo
davidlsander on Optimi Health ·

OPTH: A licensed manufacturer already selling MDMA while peers still wait on trials

Fair Value:US$1261.0% undervalued
15 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
2 users have liked this narrative
FU
VRT logo
FundamentalFlow on Vertiv Holdings Co ·

The Short and Long Term Compounder of Liquid Cooling industry.

Fair Value:US$45037.4% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
JO
John_Eric
SPXC logo
John_Eric on SPX Technologies ·

I Fell in Love With a Data-Center Cooling Stock. Then I Opened the Filings.

Fair Value:US$2036.8% overvalued
7 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
3 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
GQG logo
tripledub on GQG Partners ·

The Cheap Genius Problem

Fair Value:AU$2.4540.0% undervalued
17 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
18 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

NE
NeuralAlpha
NVDA logo
NeuralAlpha on NVIDIA ·

NVIDIA: The Indispensable Backbone of the AI Revolution

Fair Value:US$25013.0% undervalued
20 users have followed this narrative
4 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
CO
CSCO logo
CoksiBoy on Cisco Systems ·

AI Workforce Rollout

Fair Value:US$14516.9% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
RockeTeller
AUAU logo
RockeTeller on A2 Gold ·

Nevada Gold Silver Giant: 1.4Moz Gold + 20Moz Silver Potential, Kinross-Backed Nevada Play Exploding?

Fair Value:CA$4.2484.2% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

OS
oscargarcia
NVDA logo
oscargarcia on NVIDIA ·

The company that went from selling GPUs to gamers to becoming the AI arms dealer of the 21st century.

Fair Value:US$28022.3% undervalued
297 users have followed this narrative
9 users have commented on this narrative
16 users have liked this narrative
CU
MSFT logo
CubanEros on Microsoft ·

A wonderful business at reasonable price.

Fair Value:US$419.9120.0% overvalued
159 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative
KI
AMZN logo
KiwiInvest on Amazon.com ·

Amazon's high growth, high tech segments propel its profits, while traditional segments plod along

Fair Value:US$475.0942.7% undervalued
178 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
8 users have liked this narrative

Trending Discussion

M0
PONY logo
m00sekateer on Pony AI ·

Checked it. The arithmetic is fine; the inputs aren't, and the conclusion doesn't follow even if they were.1. Fare. $7 is a US robotaxi price. Pony's record peak day in Shenzhen (22 March 2026) was RMB394 net revenue per Gen-7 vehicle on 25 orders — about US$2.20 per order. You're roughly 3x high.2. Utilisation. 25 orders/day is Pony's all-time single-day high, not an average, and you then run it 365 days with zero downtime for charging, cleaning, maintenance, weather or geofence interruption.Corrected, the best day Pony has ever recorded yields ~US$55/day. On $43k of hardware that's ~26 months of gross revenue, before any operating cost. The reported actuals agree: FY2025 robotaxi services revenue US$16.6m on a fleet just past 1,000 units; Q1 2026 US$8.6m with the fleet above 1,700 — call it US$20–25k per vehicle per year against your $63,875.3. The caveat is the whole argument. You flag "not including operational costs (people costs)" and then set it aside. Remote safety operators, platform commissions, charging, insurance, cleaning, depot and maintenance are what determine whether a robotaxi contributes anything at all.4. Payback isn't profitability. Q1 2026: 16.2% gross margin on US$34.3m revenue, US$63.9m of opex, US$53.5m net loss. Marginal hardware payback says nothing about R&D, mapping, licensing or overhead.5. Falling BOM cuts both ways. Pony targets sub-RMB230k (~US$34k) total vehicle cost for 2027. Great for new units, bad for the residual value of fleets already deployed on a five-year depreciation schedule.What you get right: the cost trajectory is real, and city-wide UE breakeven in Guangzhou (Nov 2025) and Shenzhen (Feb 2026) is a genuine milestone. But that is contribution-margin breakeven per trip — not "cracked the per-unit cost," and not an 8-month payback. Your post predates all of it; the data has since landed, and it's less favourable on revenue per vehicle than the model assumed.

0
|
0