Stock Analysis

Bajaj Auto Limited's (NSE:BAJAJ-AUTO) Business Is Yet to Catch Up With Its Share Price

NSEI:BAJAJ-AUTO
Source: Shutterstock

With a median price-to-earnings (or "P/E") ratio of close to 31x in India, you could be forgiven for feeling indifferent about Bajaj Auto Limited's (NSE:BAJAJ-AUTO) P/E ratio of 32.5x. While this might not raise any eyebrows, if the P/E ratio is not justified investors could be missing out on a potential opportunity or ignoring looming disappointment.

Bajaj Auto certainly has been doing a good job lately as it's been growing earnings more than most other companies. It might be that many expect the strong earnings performance to wane, which has kept the P/E from rising. If you like the company, you'd be hoping this isn't the case so that you could potentially pick up some stock while it's not quite in favour.

View our latest analysis for Bajaj Auto

pe-multiple-vs-industry
NSEI:BAJAJ-AUTO Price to Earnings Ratio vs Industry May 13th 2024
If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free report on Bajaj Auto.

Does Growth Match The P/E?

The only time you'd be comfortable seeing a P/E like Bajaj Auto's is when the company's growth is tracking the market closely.

If we review the last year of earnings growth, the company posted a terrific increase of 28%. The latest three year period has also seen an excellent 64% overall rise in EPS, aided by its short-term performance. So we can start by confirming that the company has done a great job of growing earnings over that time.

Turning to the outlook, the next three years should generate growth of 14% per year as estimated by the analysts watching the company. With the market predicted to deliver 21% growth each year, the company is positioned for a weaker earnings result.

In light of this, it's curious that Bajaj Auto's P/E sits in line with the majority of other companies. It seems most investors are ignoring the fairly limited growth expectations and are willing to pay up for exposure to the stock. These shareholders may be setting themselves up for future disappointment if the P/E falls to levels more in line with the growth outlook.

The Key Takeaway

Using the price-to-earnings ratio alone to determine if you should sell your stock isn't sensible, however it can be a practical guide to the company's future prospects.

Our examination of Bajaj Auto's analyst forecasts revealed that its inferior earnings outlook isn't impacting its P/E as much as we would have predicted. When we see a weak earnings outlook with slower than market growth, we suspect the share price is at risk of declining, sending the moderate P/E lower. Unless these conditions improve, it's challenging to accept these prices as being reasonable.

Plus, you should also learn about these 2 warning signs we've spotted with Bajaj Auto.

Of course, you might also be able to find a better stock than Bajaj Auto. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have reasonable P/E ratios and have grown earnings strongly.

Valuation is complex, but we're here to simplify it.

Discover if Bajaj Auto might be undervalued or overvalued with our detailed analysis, featuring fair value estimates, potential risks, dividends, insider trades, and its financial condition.

Access Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.