Stock Analysis

Natural Gas Distribution (TADAWUL:9516) Has More To Do To Multiply In Value Going Forward

SASE:9516
Source: Shutterstock

Did you know there are some financial metrics that can provide clues of a potential multi-bagger? In a perfect world, we'd like to see a company investing more capital into its business and ideally the returns earned from that capital are also increasing. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. Although, when we looked at Natural Gas Distribution (TADAWUL:9516), it didn't seem to tick all of these boxes.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Natural Gas Distribution:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

0.065 = ر.س4.2m ÷ (ر.س94m - ر.س30m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2023).

Therefore, Natural Gas Distribution has an ROCE of 6.5%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Gas Utilities industry average of 8.7%.

Check out our latest analysis for Natural Gas Distribution

roce
SASE:9516 Return on Capital Employed April 9th 2024

While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you're interested in investigating Natural Gas Distribution's past further, check out this free graph covering Natural Gas Distribution's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

What Can We Tell From Natural Gas Distribution's ROCE Trend?

There hasn't been much to report for Natural Gas Distribution's returns and its level of capital employed because both metrics have been steady for the past five years. It's not uncommon to see this when looking at a mature and stable business that isn't re-investing its earnings because it has likely passed that phase of the business cycle. So unless we see a substantial change at Natural Gas Distribution in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.

On another note, while the change in ROCE trend might not scream for attention, it's interesting that the current liabilities have actually gone up over the last five years. This is intriguing because if current liabilities hadn't increased to 32% of total assets, this reported ROCE would probably be less than6.5% because total capital employed would be higher.The 6.5% ROCE could be even lower if current liabilities weren't 32% of total assets, because the the formula would show a larger base of total capital employed. So while current liabilities isn't high right now, keep an eye out in case it increases further, because this can introduce some elements of risk.

The Bottom Line

In a nutshell, Natural Gas Distribution has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. Additionally, the stock's total return to shareholders over the last year has been flat, which isn't too surprising. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.

One final note, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Natural Gas Distribution (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant) .

While Natural Gas Distribution may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.

Valuation is complex, but we're helping make it simple.

Find out whether Natural Gas Distribution is potentially over or undervalued by checking out our comprehensive analysis, which includes fair value estimates, risks and warnings, dividends, insider transactions and financial health.

View the Free Analysis

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.