Read This Before You Buy Control4 Corporation (NASDAQ:CTRL) Because Of Its P/E Ratio

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

This article is written for those who want to get better at using price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll show how you can use Control4 Corporation’s (NASDAQ:CTRL) P/E ratio to inform your assessment of the investment opportunity. Based on the last twelve months, Control4’s P/E ratio is 10.83. That is equivalent to an earnings yield of about 9.2%.

View our latest analysis for Control4

How Do You Calculate A P/E Ratio?

The formula for P/E is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Control4:

P/E of 10.83 = $18.09 ÷ $1.67 (Based on the year to December 2018.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that buyers have to pay a higher price for each $1 the company has earned over the last year. That isn’t necessarily good or bad, but a high P/E implies relatively high expectations of what a company can achieve in the future.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

P/E ratios primarily reflect market expectations around earnings growth rates. When earnings grow, the ‘E’ increases, over time. That means unless the share price increases, the P/E will reduce in a few years. Then, a lower P/E should attract more buyers, pushing the share price up.

It’s nice to see that Control4 grew EPS by a stonking 159% in the last year. And its annual EPS growth rate over 5 years is 35%. I’d therefore be a little surprised if its P/E ratio was not relatively high.

How Does Control4’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

We can get an indication of market expectations by looking at the P/E ratio. If you look at the image below, you can see Control4 has a lower P/E than the average (19.5) in the electronic industry classification.

NASDAQGS:CTRL PE PEG Gauge February 9th 19
NASDAQGS:CTRL PE PEG Gauge February 9th 19

Its relatively low P/E ratio indicates that Control4 shareholders think it will struggle to do as well as other companies in its industry classification. Many investors like to buy stocks when the market is pessimistic about their prospects. You should delve deeper. I like to check if company insiders have been buying or selling.

A Limitation: P/E Ratios Ignore Debt and Cash In The Bank

The ‘Price’ in P/E reflects the market capitalization of the company. In other words, it does not consider any debt or cash that the company may have on the balance sheet. Hypothetically, a company could reduce its future P/E ratio by spending its cash (or taking on debt) to achieve higher earnings.

Spending on growth might be good or bad a few years later, but the point is that the P/E ratio does not account for the option (or lack thereof).

How Does Control4’s Debt Impact Its P/E Ratio?

The extra options and safety that comes with Control4’s US$93m net cash position means that it deserves a higher P/E than it would if it had a lot of net debt.

The Bottom Line On Control4’s P/E Ratio

Control4 trades on a P/E ratio of 10.8, which is below the US market average of 16.8. The net cash position gives plenty of options to the business, and the recent improvement in EPS is good to see. The below average P/E ratio suggests that market participants don’t believe the strong growth will continue.

When the market is wrong about a stock, it gives savvy investors an opportunity. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, ‘In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.’ So this free visual report on analyst forecasts could hold they key to an excellent investment decision.

You might be able to find a better buy than Control4. If you want a selection of possible winners, check out this free list of interesting companies that trade on a P/E below 20 (but have proven they can grow earnings).

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.