# Does Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation’s (NASDAQ:PPC) PE Ratio Warrant A Buy?

Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (NASDAQ:PPC) is trading with a trailing P/E of 6.2x, which is lower than the industry average of 18.6x. Although some investors may jump to the conclusion that this is a great buying opportunity, understanding the assumptions behind the P/E ratio might change your mind. In this article, I will explain what the P/E ratio is as well as what you should look out for when using it.

### Demystifying the P/E ratio

The P/E ratio is one of many ratios used in relative valuation. By comparing a stock’s price per share to its earnings per share, we are able to see how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.

Formula

Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share

P/E Calculation for PPC

Price per share = \$17.82

Earnings per share = \$2.894

∴ Price-Earnings Ratio = \$17.82 ÷ \$2.894 = 6.2x

On its own, the P/E ratio doesn’t tell you much; however, it becomes extremely useful when you compare it with other similar companies. Ultimately, our goal is to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar attributes to PPC, such as company lifetime and products sold. One way of gathering a peer group is to use firms in the same industry, which is what I’ll do. Since it is expected that similar companies have similar P/E ratios, we can come to some conclusions about the stock if the ratios are different.

At 6.2x, PPC’s P/E is lower than its industry peers (18.6x). This implies that investors are undervaluing each dollar of PPC’s earnings. This multiple is a median of profitable companies of 24 Food companies in US including China Fruits, Energroup Holdings and YaSheng Group. Therefore, according to this analysis, PPC is an under-priced stock.

### Assumptions to be aware of

While our conclusion might prompt you to buy PPC immediately, there are two important assumptions you should be aware of. The first is that our peer group actually contains companies that are similar to PPC. If this isn’t the case, the difference in P/E could be due to some other factors. For example, if you are inadvertently comparing lower risk firms with PPC, then PPC’s P/E would naturally be lower than its peers, since investors would value those with lower risk with a higher price. The other possibility is if you were accidentally comparing higher growth firms with PPC. In this case, PPC’s P/E would be lower since investors would also reward its peers’ higher growth with a higher price. The second assumption that must hold true is that the stocks we are comparing PPC to are fairly valued by the market. If this assumption does not hold true, PPC’s lower P/E ratio may be because firms in our peer group are being overvalued by the market.

### What this means for you:

If your personal research into the stock confirms what the P/E ratio is telling you, it might be a good time to add more of PPC to your portfolio. But keep in mind that the usefulness of relative valuation depends on whether you are comfortable with making the assumptions I mentioned above. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

1. Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for PPC’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for PPC’s outlook.
2. Past Track Record: Has PPC been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of PPC’s historicals for more clarity.
3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.