Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Construction Partners, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROAD) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Advertisement

When Is Debt A Problem?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

How Much Debt Does Construction Partners Carry?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2025 Construction Partners had US$1.36b of debt, an increase on US$438.4m, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$101.9m, its net debt is less, at about US$1.26b.

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:ROAD Debt to Equity History June 16th 2025

How Strong Is Construction Partners' Balance Sheet?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Construction Partners had liabilities of US$513.6m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.43b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$101.9m and US$455.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.39b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

This deficit isn't so bad because Construction Partners is worth US$5.81b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

See our latest analysis for Construction Partners

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

Construction Partners's debt is 4.6 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 2.6 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. The good news is that Construction Partners grew its EBIT a smooth 50% over the last twelve months. Like the milk of human kindness that sort of growth increases resilience, making the company more capable of managing debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Construction Partners's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Construction Partners produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 64% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

Our View

Happily, Construction Partners's impressive EBIT growth rate implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But we must concede we find its net debt to EBITDA has the opposite effect. All these things considered, it appears that Construction Partners can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example Construction Partners has 2 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

New: AI Stock Screener & Alerts

Our new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.

• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)
• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying
• High growth Tech and AI Companies

Or build your own from over 50 metrics.

Explore Now for Free

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

About NasdaqGS:ROAD

Construction Partners

A civil infrastructure company, constructs and maintains roadways in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas.

Solid track record with reasonable growth potential.

Advertisement

Weekly Picks

ST
stuart_roberts
UG logo
stuart_roberts on Upside Gold ·

An Undervalued 3.3Moz Gold Project in Canada

Fair Value:CA$5.0774.4% undervalued
218 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
31 users have liked this narrative
SI
SimpleMan887
GME logo
SimpleMan887 on GameStop ·

GameStop will ace the financial crisis wave with its strategic Bitcoin investment and cash reserves

Fair Value:US$22089.4% undervalued
55 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
21 users have liked this narrative
YI
HSAI logo
yiannisz on Hesai Group ·

The First Real Lidar Winner

Fair Value:US$27.0716.3% undervalued
14 users have followed this narrative
1 users have commented on this narrative
4 users have liked this narrative
TR
tripledub
TSM logo
tripledub on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ·

The Most Wonderful Monopoly in the Most Dangerous Neighbourhood on Earth

Fair Value:US$3812.7% undervalued
12 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
13 users have liked this narrative

Updated Narratives

TA
Talos
FEAM logo
Talos on 5E Advanced Materials ·

5E Advanced Materials (FEAM): A Binary Critical Minerals Play with a $6.65 Fair Value Target

Fair Value:US$6.6577.4% undervalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
53
RXRX logo
537578 on Recursion Pharmaceuticals ·

Recursion Pharmaceuticals! WTH is going on?

Fair Value:US$1.9766.5% overvalued
8 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative
RO
Robbo
V logo
Robbo on Visa ·

Visa and the Case for Patience in Premium Businesses

Fair Value:US$2808.7% overvalued
1 users have followed this narrative
0 users have commented on this narrative
0 users have liked this narrative

Popular Narratives

TR
tripledub
MSFT logo
tripledub on Microsoft ·

Everyone's Terrified Microsoft Will Keep Spending. I'm Terrified They'll Stop.

Fair Value:US$3956.1% undervalued
45 users have followed this narrative
3 users have commented on this narrative
42 users have liked this narrative
RO
Robbo
TSLA logo
Robbo on Tesla ·

The academically fascinating Tesla

Fair Value:US$301.1k% overvalued
37 users have followed this narrative
11 users have commented on this narrative
31 users have liked this narrative
AN
AnalystConsensusTarget
MSFT logo
AnalystConsensusTarget on Microsoft ·

Analyst Commentary Highlights Microsoft AI Momentum and Upward Valuation Amid Growth and Competitive Risks

Fair Value:US$587.3136.9% undervalued
1351 users have followed this narrative
2 users have commented on this narrative
11 users have liked this narrative