# Here’s How P/E Ratios Can Help Us Understand Lindab International AB (STO:LIAB)

The goal of this article is to teach you how to use price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll show how you can use Lindab International AB’s (STO:LIAB) P/E ratio to inform your assessment of the investment opportunity. Lindab International has a price to earnings ratio of 14.45, based on the last twelve months. That means that at current prices, buyers pay SEK14.45 for every SEK1 in trailing yearly profits.

### How Do I Calculate A Price To Earnings Ratio?

The formula for P/E is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Share Price ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Lindab International:

P/E of 14.45 = SEK70.4 ÷ SEK4.87 (Based on the year to September 2018.)

### Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that buyers have to pay a higher price for each SEK1 the company has earned over the last year. That isn’t a good or a bad thing on its own, but a high P/E means that buyers have a higher opinion of the business’s prospects, relative to stocks with a lower P/E.

### How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Probably the most important factor in determining what P/E a company trades on is the earnings growth. That’s because companies that grow earnings per share quickly will rapidly increase the ‘E’ in the equation. That means unless the share price increases, the P/E will reduce in a few years. Then, a lower P/E should attract more buyers, pushing the share price up.

Lindab International saw earnings per share improve by -8.8% last year. And its annual EPS growth rate over 5 years is 8.1%.

### How Does Lindab International’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio indicates whether the market has higher or lower expectations of a company. If you look at the image below, you can see Lindab International has a lower P/E than the average (17.4) in the building industry classification.

Its relatively low P/E ratio indicates that Lindab International shareholders think it will struggle to do as well as other companies in its industry classification. Since the market seems unimpressed with Lindab International, it’s quite possible it could surprise on the upside. It is arguably worth checking if insiders are buying shares, because that might imply they believe the stock is undervalued.

### Remember: P/E Ratios Don’t Consider The Balance Sheet

It’s important to note that the P/E ratio considers the market capitalization, not the enterprise value. Thus, the metric does not reflect cash or debt held by the company. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Such expenditure might be good or bad, in the long term, but the point here is that the balance sheet is not reflected by this ratio.

### Lindab International’s Balance Sheet

Net debt totals 20% of Lindab International’s market cap. It would probably deserve a higher P/E ratio if it was net cash, since it would have more options for growth.

### The Bottom Line On Lindab International’s P/E Ratio

Lindab International has a P/E of 14.4. That’s around the same as the average in the SE market, which is 15.5. With modest debt and some recent earnings growth, it seems likely the market expects a steady performance going forward.

Investors should be looking to buy stocks that the market is wrong about. If the reality for a company is not as bad as the P/E ratio indicates, then the share price should increase as the market realizes this. So this free report on the analyst consensus forecasts could help you make a master move on this stock.

Of course you might be able to find a better stock than Lindab International. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have grown earnings strongly.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.