This analysis is intended to introduce important early concepts to people who are starting to invest and want to learn about the link between company’s fundamentals and stock market performance.
Cereal Planet PLC (WSE:CRP) is trading with a trailing P/E of 26.4, which is higher than the industry average of 7.1. While this might not seem positive, it is important to understand the assumptions behind the P/E ratio before you make any investment decisions. In this article, I will break down what the P/E ratio is, how to interpret it and what other factors to keep in mind.
Breaking down the P/E ratio
The P/E ratio is one of many ratios used in relative valuation. By comparing a stock’s price per share to its earnings per share, we are able to see how much investors are paying for each dollar of the company’s earnings.
Price-Earnings Ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
P/E Calculation for CRP
Price per share = €2.4
Earnings per share = €0.0910
∴ Price-Earnings Ratio = €2.4 ÷ €0.0910 = 26.4x
On its own, the P/E ratio doesn’t tell you much; however, it becomes extremely useful when you compare it with other similar companies. We preferably want to compare the stock’s P/E ratio to the average of companies that have similar features to CRP, such as capital structure and profitability. One way of gathering a peer group is to use firms in the same industry, which is what I’ll do. Since it is expected that similar companies have similar P/E ratios, we can come to some conclusions about the stock if the ratios are different.
Since CRP’s P/E of 26.4 is higher than its industry peers (7.1), it means that investors are paying more for each dollar of CRP’s earnings. This multiple is a median of profitable companies of 20 Food companies in PL including Agroliga Group, Indykpol Spolka Akcyjna and Zaklady Miesne Henryk Kania Spólka Akcyjna. You could also say that the market is suggesting that CRP has a stronger business than the average comparable company.
Assumptions to watch out for
However, it is important to note that our examination of the stock is based on certain assumptions. The first is that our “similar companies” are actually similar to CRP. If not, the difference in P/E might be a result of other factors. Take, for example, the scenario where Cereal Planet PLC is growing profits more quickly than the average comparable company. In that case, the market may be correct to value it on a higher P/E ratio. We should also be aware that the stocks we are comparing to CRP may not be fairly valued. So while we can reasonably surmise that it is optimistically valued relative to a peer group, it might be fairly valued, if the peer group is undervalued.
What this means for you:
You may have already conducted fundamental analysis on the stock as a shareholder, so its current overvaluation could signal a potential selling opportunity to reduce your exposure to CRP. Now that you understand the ins and outs of the PE metric, you should know to bear in mind its limitations before you make an investment decision. Remember that basing your investment decision off one metric alone is certainly not sufficient. There are many things I have not taken into account in this article and the PE ratio is very one-dimensional. If you have not done so already, I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:
- Future Outlook: What are well-informed industry analysts predicting for CRP’s future growth? Take a look at our free research report of analyst consensus for CRP’s outlook.
- Past Track Record: Has CRP been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of CRP’s historicals for more clarity.
- Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.
To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.
The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at email@example.com.