Here’s What Sakuma Exports Limited’s (NSE:SAKUMA) ROCE Can Tell Us

Today we are going to look at Sakuma Exports Limited (NSE:SAKUMA) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. In particular, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that can give us insight into how profitably the company is able to employ capital in its business.

First, we’ll go over how we calculate ROCE. Then we’ll compare its ROCE to similar companies. Finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities affect its ROCE.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. In brief, it is a useful tool, but it is not without drawbacks. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since ‘No two businesses are exactly alike.’

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Sakuma Exports:

0.22 = ₹568m ÷ (₹8.0b – ₹5.4b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2018.)

So, Sakuma Exports has an ROCE of 22%.

View our latest analysis for Sakuma Exports

Does Sakuma Exports Have A Good ROCE?

One way to assess ROCE is to compare similar companies. Using our data, we find that Sakuma Exports’s ROCE is meaningfully better than the 7.7% average in the Consumer Retailing industry. We consider this a positive sign, because it suggests it uses capital more efficiently than similar companies. Separate from Sakuma Exports’s performance relative to its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms looks satisfactory, and it may be worth researching in more depth.

In our analysis, Sakuma Exports’s ROCE appears to be 22%, compared to 3 years ago, when its ROCE was 15%. This makes us think the business might be improving.

NSEI:SAKUMA Past Revenue and Net Income, March 17th 2019
NSEI:SAKUMA Past Revenue and Net Income, March 17th 2019

When considering this metric, keep in mind that it is backwards looking, and not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. Future performance is what matters, and you can see analyst predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

How Sakuma Exports’s Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Short term (or current) liabilities, are things like supplier invoices, overdrafts, or tax bills that need to be paid within 12 months. The ROCE equation subtracts current liabilities from capital employed, so a company with a lot of current liabilities appears to have less capital employed, and a higher ROCE than otherwise. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

Sakuma Exports has total assets of ₹8.0b and current liabilities of ₹5.4b. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 68% of its total assets. Sakuma Exports’s current liabilities are fairly high, which increases its ROCE significantly.

What We Can Learn From Sakuma Exports’s ROCE

The ROCE would not look as appealing if the company had fewer current liabilities. You might be able to find a better buy than Sakuma Exports. If you want a selection of possible winners, check out this free list of interesting companies that trade on a P/E below 20 (but have proven they can grow earnings).

I will like Sakuma Exports better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.