Why You Should Like Gem Diamonds Limited’s (LON:GEMD) ROCE

Today we are going to look at Gem Diamonds Limited (LON:GEMD) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. To be precise, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), as that will inform our view of the quality of the business.

First up, we’ll look at what ROCE is and how we calculate it. Then we’ll compare its ROCE to similar companies. And finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities are impacting its ROCE.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

ROCE measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. Ultimately, it is a useful but imperfect metric. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since ‘No two businesses are exactly alike.’

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Gem Diamonds:

0.21 = US$71m ÷ (US$393m – US$52m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2018.)

Therefore, Gem Diamonds has an ROCE of 21%.

View our latest analysis for Gem Diamonds

Is Gem Diamonds’s ROCE Good?

ROCE can be useful when making comparisons, such as between similar companies. Using our data, we find that Gem Diamonds’s ROCE is meaningfully better than the 13% average in the Metals and Mining industry. We consider this a positive sign, because it suggests it uses capital more efficiently than similar companies. Regardless of the industry comparison, in absolute terms, Gem Diamonds’s ROCE currently appears to be excellent.

LSE:GEMD Past Revenue and Net Income, April 2nd 2019
LSE:GEMD Past Revenue and Net Income, April 2nd 2019

Remember that this metric is backwards looking – it shows what has happened in the past, and does not accurately predict the future. ROCE can be misleading for companies in cyclical industries, with returns looking impressive during the boom times, but very weak during the busts. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. We note Gem Diamonds could be considered a cyclical business. Since the future is so important for investors, you should check out our free report on analyst forecasts for Gem Diamonds.

How Gem Diamonds’s Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Current liabilities include invoices, such as supplier payments, short-term debt, or a tax bill, that need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way ROCE is calculated, a high level of current liabilities makes a company look as though it has less capital employed, and thus can (sometimes unfairly) boost the ROCE. To check the impact of this, we calculate if a company has high current liabilities relative to its total assets.

Gem Diamonds has total liabilities of US$52m and total assets of US$393m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 13% of its total assets. A minimal amount of current liabilities limits the impact on ROCE.

Our Take On Gem Diamonds’s ROCE

With low current liabilities and a high ROCE, Gem Diamonds could be worthy of further investigation. But note: Gem Diamonds may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with strong recent earnings growth (and a P/E ratio below 20).

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.