latest

# Should We Worry About Capgemini SE’s (EPA:CAP) P/E Ratio?

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a \$250 gift card!

The goal of this article is to teach you how to use price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). To keep it practical, we’ll show how Capgemini SE’s (EPA:CAP) P/E ratio could help you assess the value on offer. Capgemini has a price to earnings ratio of 23.47, based on the last twelve months. In other words, at today’s prices, investors are paying €23.47 for every €1 in prior year profit.

### How Do I Calculate Capgemini’s Price To Earnings Ratio?

The formula for P/E is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Share Price ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Capgemini:

P/E of 23.47 = €102.55 ÷ €4.37 (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2018.)

### Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that buyers have to pay a higher price for each €1 the company has earned over the last year. That is not a good or a bad thing per se, but a high P/E does imply buyers are optimistic about the future.

### How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Companies that shrink earnings per share quickly will rapidly decrease the ‘E’ in the equation. That means even if the current P/E is low, it will increase over time if the share price stays flat. So while a stock may look cheap based on past earnings, it could be expensive based on future earnings.

Capgemini’s earnings per share fell by 10% in the last twelve months. But it has grown its earnings per share by 7.2% per year over the last five years. And over the longer term (3 years) earnings per share have decreased 17% annually. This could justify a low P/E.

### How Does Capgemini’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio essentially measures market expectations of a company. You can see in the image below that the average P/E (19.2) for companies in the it industry is lower than Capgemini’s P/E.

Its relatively high P/E ratio indicates that Capgemini shareholders think it will perform better than other companies in its industry classification. The market is optimistic about the future, but that doesn’t guarantee future growth. So investors should delve deeper. I like to check if company insiders have been buying or selling.

### Don’t Forget: The P/E Does Not Account For Debt or Bank Deposits

The ‘Price’ in P/E reflects the market capitalization of the company. In other words, it does not consider any debt or cash that the company may have on the balance sheet. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Such spending might be good or bad, overall, but the key point here is that you need to look at debt to understand the P/E ratio in context.

### Capgemini’s Balance Sheet

Net debt totals 14% of Capgemini’s market cap. It would probably deserve a higher P/E ratio if it was net cash, since it would have more options for growth.

### The Bottom Line On Capgemini’s P/E Ratio

Capgemini trades on a P/E ratio of 23.5, which is above the FR market average of 15.1. With modest debt but no EPS growth in the last year, it’s fair to say the P/E implies some optimism about future earnings, from the market.

Investors should be looking to buy stocks that the market is wrong about. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, ‘In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.’ So this free report on the analyst consensus forecasts could help you make a master move on this stock.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.