A Close Look At Vermilion Energy Inc.’s (TSE:VET) 6.6% ROCE

Want to participate in a short research study? Help shape the future of investing tools and you could win a $250 gift card!

Today we’ll look at Vermilion Energy Inc. (TSE:VET) and reflect on its potential as an investment. Specifically, we’re going to calculate its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), in the hopes of getting some insight into the business.

First, we’ll go over how we calculate ROCE. Then we’ll compare its ROCE to similar companies. Last but not least, we’ll look at what impact its current liabilities have on its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. Overall, it is a valuable metric that has its flaws. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that ‘one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar’.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Vermilion Energy:

0.066 = CA$383m ÷ (CA$6.2b – CA$459m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2019.)

Therefore, Vermilion Energy has an ROCE of 6.6%.

Check out our latest analysis for Vermilion Energy

Does Vermilion Energy Have A Good ROCE?

ROCE is commonly used for comparing the performance of similar businesses. Vermilion Energy’s ROCE appears to be substantially greater than the 5.5% average in the Oil and Gas industry. We consider this a positive sign, because it suggests it uses capital more efficiently than similar companies. Aside from the industry comparison, Vermilion Energy’s ROCE is mediocre in absolute terms, considering the risk of investing in stocks versus the safety of a bank account. It is possible that there are more rewarding investments out there.

Vermilion Energy reported an ROCE of 6.6% — better than 3 years ago, when the company didn’t make a profit. This makes us wonder if the company is improving.

TSX:VET Past Revenue and Net Income, June 17th 2019
TSX:VET Past Revenue and Net Income, June 17th 2019

Remember that this metric is backwards looking – it shows what has happened in the past, and does not accurately predict the future. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. Given the industry it operates in, Vermilion Energy could be considered cyclical. What happens in the future is pretty important for investors, so we have prepared a free report on analyst forecasts for Vermilion Energy.

Do Vermilion Energy’s Current Liabilities Skew Its ROCE?

Liabilities, such as supplier bills and bank overdrafts, are referred to as current liabilities if they need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

Vermilion Energy has total liabilities of CA$459m and total assets of CA$6.2b. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 7.4% of its total assets. With low levels of current liabilities, at least Vermilion Energy’s mediocre ROCE is not unduly boosted.

What We Can Learn From Vermilion Energy’s ROCE

Based on this information, Vermilion Energy appears to be a mediocre business. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: insiders have been buying them).

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.