Here’s How P/E Ratios Can Help Us Understand Storm Resources Ltd (TSE:SRX)

The goal of this article is to teach you how to use price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll show how you can use Storm Resources Ltd’s (TSE:SRX) P/E ratio to inform your assessment of the investment opportunity. Based on the last twelve months, Storm Resources’s P/E ratio is 16.59. That means that at current prices, buyers pay CA$16.59 for every CA$1 in trailing yearly profits.

Check out our latest analysis for Storm Resources

How Do You Calculate A P/E Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Storm Resources:

P/E of 16.59 = CA$2.1 ÷ CA$0.13 (Based on the year to June 2018.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that buyers have to pay a higher price for each CA$1 the company has earned over the last year. That isn’t a good or a bad thing on its own, but a high P/E means that buyers have a higher opinion of the business’s prospects, relative to stocks with a lower P/E.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Probably the most important factor in determining what P/E a company trades on is the earnings growth. When earnings grow, the ‘E’ increases, over time. That means unless the share price increases, the P/E will reduce in a few years. Then, a lower P/E should attract more buyers, pushing the share price up.

Storm Resources shrunk earnings per share by 12% over the last year. But it has grown its earnings per share by 43% per year over the last five years.

How Does Storm Resources’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

We can get an indication of market expectations by looking at the P/E ratio. You can see in the image below that the average P/E (17.5) for companies in the oil and gas industry is roughly the same as Storm Resources’s P/E.

TSX:SRX PE PEG Gauge November 9th 18
TSX:SRX PE PEG Gauge November 9th 18

Its P/E ratio suggests that Storm Resources shareholders think that in the future it will perform about the same as other companies in its industry classification. The company could surprise by performing better than average, in the future. Further research into factors such asmanagement tenure, could help you form your own view on whether that is likely.

A Limitation: P/E Ratios Ignore Debt and Cash In The Bank

It’s important to note that the P/E ratio considers the market capitalization, not the enterprise value. That means it doesn’t take debt or cash into account. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Such spending might be good or bad, overall, but the key point here is that you need to look at debt to understand the P/E ratio in context.

Storm Resources’s Balance Sheet

Storm Resources has net debt worth 34% of its market capitalization. If you want to compare its P/E ratio to other companies, you should absolutely keep in mind it has significant borrowings.

The Verdict On Storm Resources’s P/E Ratio

Storm Resources trades on a P/E ratio of 16.6, which is above the CA market average of 14.8. With a bit of debt, but a lack of recent growth, it’s safe to say the market is expecting improved profit performance from the company, in the next few years.

When the market is wrong about a stock, it gives savvy investors an opportunity. If the reality for a company is better than it expects, you can make money by buying and holding for the long term. So this free report on the analyst consensus forecasts could help you make a master move on this stock.

Of course you might be able to find a better stock than Storm Resources. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have grown earnings strongly.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.